[2019] KEELC 2888 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 2888 (KLR)

The court exercised its discretion to allow the late filing of the petitioner's submissions and further affidavit, finding that it was reasonable and in the interest of justice. The court also granted the respondents leave to file their responses and submissions within seven days, ensuring that both parties had a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 2888 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mutegi Mugwetwa; Respondent: Chief Officer Lands, Physical Planning, Housing, Urban Development, Environment and Natural Resources; Respondent: The Governor, County Government of Tharaka Nithi; Respondent: The County Government of Tharaka Nithi; Respondent: National Police Service; Respondent: Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Constitutional Petition 01 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Directions on Filing and Exchange of Submissions
Outcome
Interlocutory orders granted; directions issued for filing and exchange of submissions.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Right to Property, Fair Administrative Action, Land Registration, County Government Powers
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Land and Property Right to Property Fair Administrative Action Land Registration County Government Powers

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mutegi Mugwetwa

Applicant

Chief Officer Lands, Physical Planning, Housing, Urban Development, Environment and Natural Resources

Respondent

The Governor, County Government of Tharaka Nithi

Respondent

The County Government of Tharaka Nithi

Respondent

National Police Service

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Directions on Filing and Exchange of Submissions

  1. 1 Whether the late filing of the petitioner's submissions and further affidavit should be deemed as properly filed.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents should be granted leave to file their responses and submissions out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court exercised its discretion to allow the late filing of the petitioner's submissions and further affidavit, finding that it was reasonable and in the interest of justice. The court also granted the respondents leave to file their responses and submissions within seven days, ensuring that both parties had a fair opportunity to present their cases. These directions were issued to facilitate the just, expeditious, and fair determination of the constitutional petition, in line with the principles of fair hearing and access to justice under the Constitution.

Court Disposition

Interlocutory orders granted; directions issued for filing and exchange of submissions.

Orders

  • Petitioner to avail soft copies of the further affidavit filed on 20.6.2019 and written submissions to court within 7 days.
  • 1st, 2nd, and 3rd respondents granted leave to respond to the petitioner's further affidavit and to file their written submissions and soft copies within 7 days of the ruling.