[2019] KEELC 231 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA

CHUKA ELC CASE NO. 215 OF 2017

FORMERLY MERU ELC. 08 OF 2015

FORMERLY EMBU ELC. 266 OF 2015

MUTEGI MUGWETWA........................................................................................................PLAINTIFF

VERSUS

COUNTY MINISTRY OF LANDS, PHYSICAL PLANNING ENERGY

& ICT COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF THARAKA NITHI....................................1ST DEFENDANT

COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF THARAKA NITHI...............................................2ND DEFENDANT

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL (KENYA URBAN RURAL AUTHORITY).........3RD DEFENDANT

KENYA URBAN ROADS AUTHORITY.................................................................4TH DEFENDANT

THE REGIONAL MANAGER-UPPER EASTERN

(KENYA URBAN ROADS AUTHORITY)..............................................................5TH DEFENDANT

TERRITORIAL WORKS (K) LTD..........................................................................6TH DEFENDANT

AND

CHUKA IGAMBANG’OMBE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION............INTERESTED PARTY

RULING

1. This application which is dated 30th December, 2019 takes the following format:-

CHAMBER SUMMONS

(Under Rule 3 (2) of High Court (Practice and Procedure) Rules and the Judicature Act Cap 8 Laws of Kenya and all other enabling Provisions of Law)

LET ALL PARTIES CONCERNED attend the Honourable Judge in Chambers on the day of 2019, at 9. 00 a.m in the forenoon or so soon thereafter as Counsel for the Plaintiff/Applicant may be heard on an application for ORDERS THAT:-

1. This application be heard ex-parte in the first instance and certified as urgent for hearing during the High Court vacation.

2. The application dated the 30th December 2019 be allowed and admitted for hearing during the current High Court vacation.

3. THAT costs be in the cause.

WHICH APPLICATION is grounded on:-

a) THATthe High court is on Vacation and the Applicant has filed a Notice of Appeal against the entire award of the Honourable issued on 4th December,2019.

b) THATthe Applicant has a high chance of success with his intended appeal and the same will be rendered nugatory if the 2nd Respondents proceed to execute the Judgement of the Court delivered on 4th December,2019 by cutting off a three(3) storey building which is structurally impractical and if implemented by the 2nd Resp0ndent, the same is irreversible.

c) The award of costs to the interested Party in the judgment delivered on 4th December,2019 who enjoined themselves in their own volition is detrimental to the Applicant which costs may be taxed off any time now.

d) There is imminent risk of the 2nd Defendant demolishing the whole three storey building in the process of removing the alleged encroaching portions for the failure of the judgement delivered on 4th December,2019 to give specific metres the Applicant’s building its alleged to have encroached.

e) THATthe Applicant is willing to offer sufficient security in the sum of Kshs.300,000 as a condition for a stay order.

THATit is in the interest of justice and fairness that this Application be allowed as prayed

WHICH APPLICATION IS PREMISEDon the annexed affidavit MURIMI MURANGO and such further or other grounds to be adduced at the hearing thereof.

DATED at NAIROBI this 30th day of December, 2019.

MURIMI MURANGO ESQ.

ADVOCATES FOR THE PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT

2. During exparte hearing, advocate Murimi Murango, representing the applicant asked the court to grant orders as sought in the application. He relied on the grounds on the face of the Notice of Motion and on his supporting affidavit sworn on 30th December, 2019.

3. I issue the following orders:-

1. The applicant to properly serve the application upon the defendants and the Interested party.

2. Interpartes hearing on 27th January, 2020

3. Costs shall be in the cause

Delivered in open Court at Chuka this 31st day of December, 2019 in the presence of:

CA Ndegwa

Murimi Murango for the Applicant

P. M. NJOROGE,

JUDGE.