[2023] KEELC 16762 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 16762 (KLR)

The court, while not making a definitive pronouncement on jurisdiction at this stage, finds that there are substantial doubts as to whether it is the proper forum to adjudicate the dominant issues in the dispute, which revolve around charges over land and professional undertakings related to those charges....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 16762 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mutethia Kibira Advocates LLP; Defendant: Co-operative Bank of Kenya Limited; Defendant: New Age Developers And Construction Company Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Thika
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 78B of 2022
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Directions on Jurisdiction and Pending Applications
Outcome
Order reserving ruling date vacated; parties directed to address the court on jurisdiction.
Judges
BM Eboso
Legal Topics
Charges Over Land, Professional Undertakings, Court Jurisdiction
Source Language
en
Land and Property Banking and Finance Charges Over Land Professional Undertakings Court Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mutethia Kibira Advocates LLP

Plaintiff

Co-operative Bank of Kenya Limited

Defendant

New Age Developers And Construction Company Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Directions on Jurisdiction and Pending Applications

  1. 1 Whether the Environment and Land Court has jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes relating to charges over land titles.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is in breach of a professional undertaking to procure registration of replacement charges over subdivision titles.
  3. 3 Whether the subdivision titles remain as collateral for money lent to the 2nd defendant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court, while not making a definitive pronouncement on jurisdiction at this stage, finds that there are substantial doubts as to whether it is the proper forum to adjudicate the dominant issues in the dispute, which revolve around charges over land and professional undertakings related to those charges. Consequently, the court vacates the order reserving a ruling date for the pending applications and directs the parties to address it specifically on the question of jurisdiction before any further substantive determination is made.

Court Disposition

Order reserving ruling date vacated; parties directed to address the court on jurisdiction.

Orders

  • The order reserving a ruling date for the two applications is vacated.
  • Parties are directed to appear before the court to address the question of whether the Environment and Land Court is the proper forum to adjudicate the dominant issues in this dispute.