[2014] KEHC 2424 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 2424 (KLR)

The court found that the application to amend the previous order was merely facilitative of the implementation of its earlier orders. Since the amendment sought was procedural and necessary to give effect to the court's decision, and there was no substantive opposition or prejudice demonstrated, the court exercised...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 2424 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Muthau Meeni; Respondent: Pharis Gitau Kagondu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 38 of 1989
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Amend Order
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Amendment of Court Orders, Reconstruction of Court File, Implementation of Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Amendment of Court Orders Reconstruction of Court File Implementation of Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Muthau Meeni

Applicant

Pharis Gitau Kagondu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Amend Order

  1. 1 Whether the court should amend its previous order to include L.R. SOUTH THARAKA/TUNYAI “A”/433.
  2. 2 Whether the application is facilitative of the implementation of the court's previous orders.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application to amend the previous order was merely facilitative of the implementation of its earlier orders. Since the amendment sought was procedural and necessary to give effect to the court's decision, and there was no substantive opposition or prejudice demonstrated, the court exercised its discretion to allow the amendment. The court emphasized its inherent power to ensure that its orders are effective and can be implemented as intended.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The order issued by this Court on 2.12.2008 is amended to include L.R. SOUTH THARAKA/TUNYAI “A”/433.
  • Costs be in the cause.