[2024] KEHC 9562 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant was a mere employee and not the principal offender in the commission of the offence of selling liquor without a County Government licence. The main culprit, the employer, was not charged. The sentence of a fine of KES 100,000 or twelve months imprisonment was deemed harsh and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 9562 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Queen Mutheu; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Voi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision E106 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Sentence Revision
- Outcome
- sentence reviewed and reduced to period served; applicant to be released forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held
- Judges
- GMA Dulu
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Review, Liquor Licensing Offences, Criminal Procedure Code Revision, Mitigation of Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Queen Mutheu
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Sentence Revision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the applicant for selling liquor without a County Government licence was harsh and excessive.
- 2 Whether the applicant's status as an employee and not the main offender warranted a review of the sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant was a mere employee and not the principal offender in the commission of the offence of selling liquor without a County Government licence. The main culprit, the employer, was not charged. The sentence of a fine of KES 100,000 or twelve months imprisonment was deemed harsh and excessive in the circumstances. The court exercised its revisionary jurisdiction under Section 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code to review the sentence, holding that the applicant's role as an employee and her personal circumstances, including having a young child, justified a reduction of the sentence to the period already served.
Court Disposition
sentence reviewed and reduced to period served; applicant to be released forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held
Orders
- The sentence imposed on the applicant is reduced to the period already served in prison.
- The applicant, Queen Mutheu, is to be released forthwith from prison custody unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
Mutheu v Republic (Criminal Revision E106 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 9562 (KLR) (11 July 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 9562 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Voi
Criminal Revision E106 of 2024
GMA Dulu, J
July 11, 2024
Between
Queen Mutheu
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. This is a request for review of the sentence in Voi CM Criminal case no E061 of 2024, filed on 5th June 2024 through a letter signed by the applicant/convict Queen Mutheu who is currently in prison at Wundanyi Prison. No Section of the law was cited in the letter.
2. I note that the applicant or convict was convicted on her own plea for selling liquor without a County Government licence contrary to Section 7(1) as read with Section 53(1) of the Taita Taveta County Alcoholic Drinks Control and Licensing Act 2016.
3. On pleading guilty in Voi CM Criminal Case no E061 of 2024, she was fined ksh 100,000/= and in default to serve twelve (12) months imprisonment, on 3rd April 2024.
4. The convict has now come to this court seeking review of the sentence, the main ground or reason being that she has a young child of five (5) years who needed her presence and attention.
5. The request for revision of sentence herein was canvassed through written submissions, and I have perused and considered the submissions filed by the applicant as well as the submissions filed by the Director of Public Prosecutions.
6. I note that in their submissions, the Director of Public Prosecutions has relied on Section 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap.75) relating to the revision powers of this court on decisions, orders or judgment delivered by a Magistrate court. The Director of Public Prosecutions has informed this court that the applicant being only an employee as far as commission of the offence was concerned, the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive, as the employer was not charged.
7. Having myself reconsidered the whole matter, and since it is not in dispute that the applicant was a mere employee, and the main culprit should have been her employer, I find that the sentence imposed herein was inappropriate, harsh and excessive.
8. I thus review the sentence imposed. Since the convict has been in prison from April, I order that the sentence be and is hereby reduced to the period already served in prison. The applicant or convict Queen Mutheu will thus be released forthwith from prison custody unless otherwise lawfully held.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2024 IN OPEN COURT AT VOI.GEORGE DULUJUDGEIn the presence of:-Alfred – Court AssistantMr. Sirima for StateApplicant (virtual)