[2013] KEHC 6230 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had subdivided the original suit land, Ngenda/Kahugu-ini/16, after the decree awarding 20 acres to the defendants. The remaining parcel, Ngenda/Kahugu-ini/1274, was still registered in the plaintiff's name and was sufficient to satisfy the decree. The court held that there was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 6230 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Muthondu Nduti; Defendant: Wanyoike Kamau & Others
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 1661 of 1980
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Decree
- Outcome
- Application for review granted; orders issued to effectuate transfer of 20 acres to defendants.
- Judges
- CM Kariuki
- Legal Topics
- Review of Decree, Execution of Judgment, Land Subdivision, Trusts in Land
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Muthondu Nduti
Plaintiff
Wanyoike Kamau & Others
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Decree
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should review its decree dated 30th July 1992 to enable transfer of 20 acres to the defendants.
- 2 Whether the subdivision of the original land title by the plaintiff was intended to defeat the court's decree.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff should be compelled to execute transfer documents for the 20 acres.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had subdivided the original suit land, Ngenda/Kahugu-ini/16, after the decree awarding 20 acres to the defendants. The remaining parcel, Ngenda/Kahugu-ini/1274, was still registered in the plaintiff's name and was sufficient to satisfy the decree. The court held that there was sufficient cause to review the decree to enable its effectuation, specifically to allow the transfer of 20 acres from the remaining parcel to the defendants. The court dismissed the protest by Lucy Kigio Kamau, noting that her claim as a beneficiary was separate and could be pursued independently against the defendants after registration. The court thus granted the orders sought by...
Court Disposition
Application for review granted; orders issued to effectuate transfer of 20 acres to defendants.
Orders
- The decree of 30th July 1992 is reviewed to order transfer of 20 acres from Ngenda/Kahugu-ini/1274 to the defendants.
- The plaintiff is directed to execute documents to effect the transfer; in default, the Deputy Registrar is authorized to execute all necessary documents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
32 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
ENVIRONMENTAL & LAND DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 1661 OF 1980
MUTHONDU NDUTI..........................PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT
-VERSUS-
WANYOIKE KAMAU & OTHERS.......DEFENDANT/APPLICANT
RULING
The Defendant by an application dated 25th August 2010 seeks the following orders:
That the court be pleased to review the decree of the court dated 30th July, 1992 and order that the Defendants are entitled to 20 acres out of Land Parcel NGNDA/KAHUGU-INI/1274 which is a subdivision of NGENDA/KAHUGU-INI/16.
That the Plaintiff be directed to execute documents to effect the transfer of the said 20 acres of land from NGENDA/KAHUGU-INI/1274 which is a subdivision of NGENDA/KAHUGU-INI/16 in and default the Deputy Registrar be authorised to execute all the necessary documents to effect the transfer.
That the plaintiff be ordered to pay the costs of this application.
The application is grounded on the grounds set out on the face of the application as follows:-
That the plaintiff in order to defeat the decree of this Honourable court subdivided the suit premises Ngenda/Kahugu-ini/16.
That it is necessary to review the decree so as to effect the order to transfer 20 acres of the suit land to the defendants.
The application is further supported by the affidavit of Wanyoike Kamau one of the Defeats sworn on 25th August 2010. The said Wanyoike Kamau has deponed that after the court gave its decree awarding he defendants 20 acres out of title number Ngenda/Kahugu-ini/16 the plaintiffs subdivided the same and created 3 subtitles namely Ngenda/Kahugu-ini/1274, 1275 and 1276. The defendant depones that the plaintiff has transferred title numbers 1275 and 1276 but title number Ngenda/Kahugu-ini/1274 is still in the plaintiff’s name and it is more than 20 acres and therefore sufficient to satisfy the decree in favour of the Defendants.
A copy of the Green Card (abstract of title) in respect of L.R. Ngenda/Kahaugu-ini/16 has been annexed to Wanyoike Kamau’s affidavit and it shows that indeed the title has been subdivided into 3 titles which have been transferred as follows:-
James Njuguna Mbugua – 0. 5 acres
James Muriuki Kamau – 2. 83 acres
Muthondu Nduti – 26. 322 acres
There has been no formal response to the application but one Lucy Kigio Kamau has filed an affidavit sworn on 22nd May, 2012 protesting the grant of the 20 acres to the defendants stating the land should not only be transferred to the defendants but to all the beneficiaries for whom the plaintiff was holding the land in trust for. Quite clearly that is a separate claim from the one the defendants made against the plaintiff. If the beneficiaries have any valid claim to the land they can lodge the claim against the defendants after they have become registered as owners of the 20 acres in terms of the court decree.
I have reviewed and considered this matter and I am satisfied that the plaintiff subdivided the suit land and that title number Ngenda/Kahugu-ini/1274 now registered in favour of the plaintiff is a product of title number Ngenda/Kahugu-ini/16 and hence sufficient cause exists to enable the court to order a review of the decree to enable the decree to be effectuated.
In the premises I accordingly grant the orders sought in the Notice of Motion by the Defendants.
I make no order as to costs.
Orders accordingly.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 4TH DAY OF JULY 2013.
J. M. MUTUNGI
JUDGE
In the presence of:
………………………………………….............…… for the Plaintiffs
……………………..............................………. for the Defendants