[2025] KEHC 3365 (KLR)
The High Court found that the trial court failed to consider the period the applicant spent in remand custody before being released on bond. The applicant was in remand from 22 August 2016 to 4 June 2018, totaling one year and ten months. In accordance with Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, this period...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 3365 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Ngui Muthinji Muthui; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kiambu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision E176 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Period spent in remand to be deducted from sentence.
- Judges
- A Mshila
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Deductions, Remand Periods, Sentence Calculation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ngui Muthinji Muthui
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial court erred by failing to consider the period the applicant spent in remand when passing sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court found that the trial court failed to consider the period the applicant spent in remand custody before being released on bond. The applicant was in remand from 22 August 2016 to 4 June 2018, totaling one year and ten months. In accordance with Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, this period ought to have been deducted from the applicant's sentence. The court therefore ordered that the period of one year and ten months spent in remand be deducted from the applicant's sentence.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Period spent in remand to be deducted from sentence.
Orders
- The period of one year and ten months spent in remand by the applicant shall be deducted from his sentence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
Muthui v Republic (Criminal Revision E176 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 3365 (KLR) (18 February 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 3365 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kiambu
Criminal Revision E176 of 2024
A Mshila, J
February 18, 2025
Between
Ngui Muthinji Muthui
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. This Court has perused the judgment of the Lower Court – indeed the trial court did not take into consideration the time spent in remand.
2. The applicant was arrested on 22/08/2016 – and was released on bond on 4/06/2018 which therefore translates to one (1) year ten (10) months in remand.
3. This period can be deducted from his sentence.Orders Accordingly.
RULING DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KIAMBU THIS 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025. ………………………A. MSHILAJUDGEIn the presence of:Sanja/Julia – Court AssistantsGacharia – For the StateApplicant present in Kamiti Medium Prison