[2024] KEHC 8334 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent's application did not meet the threshold for certification as urgent. The court directed that the application be served within two days, and the appellant be given seven days from the date of the ruling to file a response. The matter was set for mention for further directions,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 8334 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Joshua Mutiso; Respondent: Winfred Akoth
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal E073 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Ruling on Application
- Outcome
- Application not certified as urgent; directions given for service and response.
- Judges
- MS Shariff
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Applications, Service of Process, Response Timelines
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joshua Mutiso
Appellant
Winfred Akoth
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Ruling on Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent's application should be certified as urgent.
- 2 What directions should be given regarding service and response timelines for the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent's application did not meet the threshold for certification as urgent. The court directed that the application be served within two days, and the appellant be given seven days from the date of the ruling to file a response. The matter was set for mention for further directions, ensuring procedural fairness and adherence to the timelines stipulated under the Civil Procedure Rules.
Court Disposition
Application not certified as urgent; directions given for service and response.
Orders
- The application is not certified as urgent.
- The application to be served within 2 days from the date of the ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
Mutiso v Akoth (Civil Appeal E073 of 2022) [2024] KEHC 8334 (KLR) (9 July 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 8334 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Civil Appeal E073 of 2022
MS Shariff, J
July 9, 2024
Between
Joshua Mutiso
Appellant
and
Winfred Akoth
Respondent
Ruling
1. Upon perusal of the Respondent’s notice of motion dated 18. 6.2024,the supporting affidavit of Winfred Akoth sworn on even date and the annexures thereto I do hereby make the following orders:-1. This application is not certified as urgent.2. The same be served within 2 days from the date hereof.3. The Appellant to file a response thereto within 7 days from the date hereof.4. Mention on 24/7/2024 for further directions.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT KISUMU THIS 9TH DAY OF JULY 2024. M. S. SHARIFFJUDGE