[2023] KEELRC 3208 (KLR)
The Court held that the Employment and Labour Relations Court possesses countrywide jurisdiction that is not curtailed by territorial boundaries, as established in prior case law. Section 15 of the Civil Procedure Act does not restrict the Court's jurisdiction in employment matters, and the Civil Procedure Act only...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEELRC 3208 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Eunice Nduku Mutisya; Respondent: Shona EPZ Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause E594 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Territorial Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Preliminary objection dismissed with costs to the Claimant.
- Judges
- L Ndolo
- Legal Topics
- Territorial Jurisdiction, Employment Contracts, Court Jurisdiction, Civil Procedure Act Application
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eunice Nduku Mutisya
Applicant
Shona EPZ Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Territorial Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi has territorial jurisdiction to hear and determine the claim where the cause of action arose in Athi River.
- 2 Whether Section 15 of the Civil Procedure Act restricts the Employment and Labour Relations Court's jurisdiction by territory.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the Employment and Labour Relations Court possesses countrywide jurisdiction that is not curtailed by territorial boundaries, as established in prior case law. Section 15 of the Civil Procedure Act does not restrict the Court's jurisdiction in employment matters, and the Civil Procedure Act only applies where there is a procedural gap in the Employment and Labour Relations Court Procedure Rules. The absence of a sitting Judge in Machakos justified the Claimant's decision to file the claim in Nairobi. Consequently, the Respondent's preliminary objection on the ground of territorial jurisdiction was found to be without merit and was overruled.
Court Disposition
Preliminary objection dismissed with costs to the Claimant.
Orders
- The Respondent's preliminary objection is overruled.
- The Respondent shall pay costs to the Claimant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
Mutisya v Shona EPZ Limited (Cause E594 of 2023) [2023] KEELRC 3208 (KLR) (7 December 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEELRC 3208 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Cause E594 of 2023
L Ndolo, J
December 7, 2023
Between
Eunice Nduku Mutisya
Claimant
and
Shona EPZ Limited
Respondent
Ruling
1. By its Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 14th August 2023, the Respondent challenges the jurisdiction of the Court to hear and determine this claim, on account of want of territorial jurisdiction.
2. In urging its Objection, the Respondent relies on Section 15 of the Civil Procedure Act, which provides for territorial jurisdiction based on several factors, including the place of business and/or occurrence of the cause of action.
3. The Respondent submits that the cause of action in this case arose in Athi River where the Respondent carries on business and where the contract of employment was executed and performed.
4. In opposing the Preliminary Objection, the Claimant relies on a number of decisions by this Court (variously constituted) affirming that the Employment and Labour Relations Court has countrywide jurisdiction that cannot be curtailed by territorial boundaries.
5. In Judith Anyango Iruka v Muthaiga Golf Club [2018] eKLR the Court stated as follows:“The Employment and Labour Relations Court is stationed in various counties and has a number of gazetted sub-registries. There are even circuit courts but the territorial jurisdiction of the Court is countrywide.”
6. In Debbie Atieno Odhiambo v Mhasibu Housing Company Limited & another [2022] eKLR it was held:“It is settled law and practice that the Employment and Labour Relations Court does not have territorial jurisdiction. Its reliance and application of the Civil Procedure Act and Rules is also fifty-fifty. The Civil Procedure Act only comes in in clear situations of a vacuum in the Employment and Labour Relations Court Procedure Rules, 2016. ”
7. In Republic v Chairman, Board of Directors National Water Harvesting & Storage Authority & another Ex Parte David Ngure Kairu [2021] eKLR it was held that the Employment and Labour Relations Court has no geographical jurisdiction.
8. Of specific relevance to the present case, although there is a sub-registry in Machakos, there is in fact no sitting Judge there. With a bit of diligence, this is a matter of fact that the Respondent could have established. The Claimant was therefore well advised to file his case in Nairobi, being the nearest fully-fledged station.
9. On the whole, I find and hold that the Respondent’s Preliminary Objection is not well taken and proceed to overrule it with costs to the Claimant.
10. Orders accordingly.
DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI THIS 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023LINNET NDOLOJUDGEAppearance:Mr. Gicheru for the ClaimantMr. Omulloh for the Respondent