[2024] KEELRC 425 (KLR)

[2024] KEELRC 425 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent's closure of its Mombasa office and relocation to Dubai, without notice or payment of terminal dues, constituted unfair and unlawful termination of the claimants' employment. The respondent failed to comply with statutory requirements under the Employment Act, 2007, including...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELRC 425 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: John Bosco Mulwa Mutua; Applicant: Charles Maina Mwaniki; Applicant: Kelvin Kai Ndago; Applicant: Abdul Mwagona Chula; Applicant: Haggai Onyango Ogowo; Applicant: Ndune Mwachiro; Applicant: Kennedy Malusi Kinyamasyo; Applicant: Davis Mwabili Felix; Applicant: Cecilia Marura Maghanga; Applicant: Pheobe Mwae Haron; Respondent: Gokal Trading Kenya Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E115 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim allowed. Judgment entered for the claimants as prayed.
Judges
M Mbarũ
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Redundancy, Terminal Dues, Severance Pay, Notice Pay, Annual Leave
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Redundancy Terminal Dues Severance Pay Notice Pay Annual Leave

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 50
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Bosco Mulwa Mutua

Applicant

Charles Maina Mwaniki

Applicant

Kelvin Kai Ndago

Applicant

Abdul Mwagona Chula

Applicant

Haggai Onyango Ogowo

Applicant

Ndune Mwachiro

Applicant

Kennedy Malusi Kinyamasyo

Applicant

Davis Mwabili Felix

Applicant

Cecilia Marura Maghanga

Applicant

Pheobe Mwae Haron

Applicant

Gokal Trading Kenya Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimants were unfairly terminated from employment without due process.
  2. 2 Whether the claimants are entitled to terminal dues including compensation, notice pay, salary arrears, severance pay, and annual leave.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent complied with statutory obligations under the Employment Act, 2007 regarding redundancy and termination.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent's closure of its Mombasa office and relocation to Dubai, without notice or payment of terminal dues, constituted unfair and unlawful termination of the claimants' employment. The respondent failed to comply with statutory requirements under the Employment Act, 2007, including providing notice, paying salary arrears, severance pay, and annual leave, and issuing certificates of service. The absence of the respondent in the proceedings left the claimants' evidence unchallenged. The court held that the claimants were entitled to compensation for unfair termination, notice pay, salary arrears, severance pay calculated at 15 days for each year worked, annual...

Court Disposition

Claim allowed. Judgment entered for the claimants as prayed.

Orders

  • Each claimant is awarded compensation for unfair and unlawful termination equivalent to one month gross salary last earned.
  • Each claimant is awarded salary arrears for nine months worked.