[2006] KEHC 991 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's evidence was uncontroverted as the respondent failed to attend the hearing or file any response. The applicant proved on a balance of probabilities that the respondent, as his advocate, received sale proceeds and gave a professional undertaking to pay Kshs 441,387.86 towards the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] KEHC 991 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mutuku; Respondent: Njiru Mbogo & Co Advocates
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 1765 of 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for applicant
- Legal Topics
- Advocate Client Relationship, Professional Undertaking, Loan Repayment, Breach of Trust
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mutuku
Applicant
Njiru Mbogo & Co Advocates
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent failed to honour a professional undertaking to pay the applicant's loan balance as instructed.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the sum of Kshs 441,387.86 plus interest and costs.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's evidence was uncontroverted as the respondent failed to attend the hearing or file any response. The applicant proved on a balance of probabilities that the respondent, as his advocate, received sale proceeds and gave a professional undertaking to pay Kshs 441,387.86 towards the applicant's loan but failed to do so. This failure caused the applicant financial loss and adverse employment consequences. The court held that the respondent was liable to pay the applicant the sum claimed, with interest and costs, and granted leave to execute the judgment before taxation.
Court Disposition
judgment for applicant
Orders
- Judgment entered in favour of the applicant for Kshs 441,387.86 plus interest at court rate from the date of suit until payment in full.
- The respondent shall pay the costs of the suit to the applicant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
Civil Case 1765 of 2001 (OS)
Mutuku………………………………………………...………...………….APPLICANT
Versus
Njiru Mbogo & Co Advocates………………………………………RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
The Originating summons when it came for hearing on 27th September, 2006 the Respondent had been served but failed to attend the hearing. The relationship between the Plaintiff/ Applicant and the Defendant/respondent is one of Advocate / client. The Plaintiff / Applicant swore an affidavit in support of originating summons dated 16th November 2001. He stated that in 1992 while he was employed by Kenya Commercial Bank Limited he applied for a loan to purchase a plot of land known as NAIROBI/BLOCK 111/1855 under the chargee’s loan scheme for its employees. That in early 1996 he wished to dispose off the plot and in that regard sought the consent of the chargee which consent was given. The purchase price was Kshs 950,000/- and the same was to be paid to the Defendant / respondent who were the advocates for both the vendor and the purchaser. That subsequently the Respondent was instructed by the Applicant to apply the sale proceed towards the liquidation of a loan which was standing at Kshs 44,387/86. That the Respondent pursuant to the said instructions by a letter dated 18th March, 1996 gave the chargee’s advocate a professional undertaking to release a sum of Kshs 441,387. 86. That amount was the balance of the loan outstanding plus interest. The deponent stated that the Respondent failed to honour his undertaking to the detriment of the Applicant. That as consequence of failure to honour the undertaking the applicant suffered hostile working conditions because he was suspected to have been a party to the dishonesty of the respondent. And further to the failure to forward the sum of Kshs 441,387. 86 the applicant lost the benefit of the chargee loan scheme for its employees. That due to the hostile working conditions as aforesaid the applicant was forced to resign from the chargee’s employment and his retirement benefits was utilized to pay the loan and other penalty charges. The applicant stated that several demands have been forwarded to the Respondent who has failed to make payment to the applicant of the aforesaid sum.
The court has considered the evidence submitted by the Applicant. That evidence is uncontroverted since the respondent did not attend to the hearing of the Originating Summons. The Applicant has on a balance of probability proved his case. The orders that he seeks are merited and the court will grant him the same.
The judgment of the court is therefore, as follows:-
(1) That judgement is hereby entered in favour of the Plaintiff for Kshs 441,387. 86 plus interest at court rate from the date of the suit until payment of full.
(2) That the Respondent shall pay the costs of the suit to the applicant.
(3) That the court hereby grants leave to the Applicant to execute the judgement of this court before taxation.
October 11, 2006
Kasango, J