[2023] KEELRC 1002 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 1002 (KLR)

The court found that the objector and the respondent are joint owners of the motor vehicle in question, and as such, the vehicle cannot be sold by public auction without the concurrence of both parties. The vehicle had been held as security for the decretal sum by agreement between the parties. The court ordered...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 1002 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Wilfred Mutwota; Respondent: Bakery Solutions Limited; Objector: NCBA Bank Kenya PLC
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 650 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Cause / Ruling on Objector's Application to Stop Sale of Motor Vehicle
Outcome
Application by objector allowed with conditions.
Judges
Nzioki wa Makau
Legal Topics
Execution of Decree, Security for Debt, Ownership of Property, Joint Ownership, Public Auction
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Execution of Decree Security for Debt Ownership of Property Joint Ownership Public Auction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wilfred Mutwota

Applicant

Bakery Solutions Limited

Respondent

NCBA Bank Kenya PLC

Objector

Procedural Posture

Cause / Ruling on Objector's Application to Stop Sale of Motor Vehicle

  1. 1 Whether the objector is entitled to stop the sale of Motor Vehicle KCC 830P by public auction.
  2. 2 Whether the vehicle can be sold without the concurrence of the joint owner (objector).
  3. 3 What conditions should govern the release of the vehicle held as security for the decretal sum.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the objector and the respondent are joint owners of the motor vehicle in question, and as such, the vehicle cannot be sold by public auction without the concurrence of both parties. The vehicle had been held as security for the decretal sum by agreement between the parties. The court ordered that the vehicle be released to the objector on the condition that the respondent provides suitable security for the payment of the balance of the decretal sum or settles the outstanding sum in full. The costs of the application were awarded to the respondent. The decision was based on the principles of joint ownership and the need to protect the interests of all parties in...

Court Disposition

Application by objector allowed with conditions.

Orders

  • The vehicle KCC 830P is to be released to the objector on condition that the respondent provides suitable security for payment of the balance of the decretal sum or wholly settles the outstanding sum.
  • The costs of the application shall be borne by the respondent.