[2022] KEHC 3152 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 3152 (KLR)

The court held that while the applicant's request to have the remand period considered in his sentence is arguable and merits consideration under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the court cannot exercise its discretion or make a determination without first reviewing the trial and appellate records....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 3152 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Leonard Muyekho; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E095 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Interlocutory Ruling on Application for Sentence Review Under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code
Outcome
Interim orders issued; application deferred pending production of records.
Judges
WM Musyoka
Legal Topics
Sentencing Review, Remand Period Credit, Robbery With Violence, Death Penalty Substitution
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Review Remand Period Credit Robbery With Violence Death Penalty Substitution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leonard Muyekho

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Interlocutory Ruling on Application for Sentence Review Under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to have the period spent in remand custody considered in the computation of his sentence under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
  2. 2 Whether the court can exercise discretion to grant the relief sought without access to the trial and appellate records.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that while the applicant's request to have the remand period considered in his sentence is arguable and merits consideration under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the court cannot exercise its discretion or make a determination without first reviewing the trial and appellate records. The court therefore directed that the relevant records be called for before proceeding further with the application.

Court Disposition

Interim orders issued; application deferred pending production of records.

Orders

  • The Deputy Registrar is directed to call for the trial records in Butali PMCRCC No. 123 of 2008, the judgements in Kakamega HCCRA No. 76 of 2010 and Kisumu CACRA No. 60 of 2014, and the ruling in Kakamega HCCPet. No. 58 of 2018.
  • The matter shall be mentioned on 28th July 2022.