[2023] KEHC 20126 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 20126 (KLR)

The application was struck out as fatally and incurably defective for two principal reasons: first, it failed to disclose the identity of the applicant(s), making it impossible for the court to grant or enforce orders; second, no leave had been sought from the insolvency court despite the existence of an appointed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 20126 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mvita Oils Limited; Defendant: New Generation Self Service Store Limited; Appellant: Madhav Sudhir Bhandari
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Voi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit E001 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Injunctive Orders and Compliance With Insolvency Act
Outcome
application struck out as fatally defective; costs to defendant; interim orders vacated
Judges
GMA Dulu
Legal Topics
Striking Out Application, Defective Pleadings, Insolvency Proceedings, Leave of Court Requirement
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Striking Out Application Defective Pleadings Insolvency Proceedings Leave of Court Requirement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mvita Oils Limited

Plaintiff

New Generation Self Service Store Limited

Defendant

Madhav Sudhir Bhandari

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Injunctive Orders and Compliance With Insolvency Act

  1. 1 Whether the application is fatally defective for failure to disclose the identity of the applicant.
  2. 2 Whether the application is incompetent for lack of leave from the insolvency court where an administrator is appointed.
  3. 3 Whether the interim orders previously issued were a nullity for want of jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi

The application was struck out as fatally and incurably defective for two principal reasons: first, it failed to disclose the identity of the applicant(s), making it impossible for the court to grant or enforce orders; second, no leave had been sought from the insolvency court despite the existence of an appointed administrator, as required by a prior ruling in a related matter. The court further held that the interim orders previously issued were not a nullity, as the court had jurisdiction to issue them, but those orders were vacated upon striking out the application.

Court Disposition

application struck out as fatally defective; costs to defendant; interim orders vacated

Orders

  • The application dated 10th May 2023 is struck out as fatally and incurably defective.
  • Costs awarded to the defendant.