[2022] KEELRC 14663 (KLR)
The court held that since there is a valid judgment dismissing the claimant's suit with costs to the respondent, and the claimant is entitled to terminal dues of Ksh 23,000, the respondent is justified in deducting the costs awarded from the claimant's terminal dues, whichever is higher. The Employment Act permits...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEELRC 14663 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Enock Mwacho; Respondent: Sunflag Textile & Knit Wear Mills Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 1890 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Ruling on Post Judgment Application
- Outcome
- application allowed in part
- Judges
- M Mbarũ
- Legal Topics
- Terminal Dues, Costs Taxation, Deductions From Wages, Execution of Judgment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Enock Mwacho
Claimant
Sunflag Textile & Knit Wear Mills Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Post Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant should be restrained from attaching the respondent's property before taxation of costs.
- 2 Whether the respondent is entitled to deduct costs from the claimant's terminal dues before payment.
- 3 Whether execution should issue before the claimant pays costs due to the respondent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that since there is a valid judgment dismissing the claimant's suit with costs to the respondent, and the claimant is entitled to terminal dues of Ksh 23,000, the respondent is justified in deducting the costs awarded from the claimant's terminal dues, whichever is higher. The Employment Act permits such deductions pursuant to a court order. Execution against the respondent's property should not issue unless the claimant has paid what he owes the respondent in costs. The application to restrain attachment and allow deduction of costs from terminal dues is therefore allowed to this extent.
Court Disposition
application allowed in part
Orders
- The claimant's terminal dues of Ksh 23,000 shall be paid less what he owes the respondent in costs, whichever is higher.
- Execution shall not issue unless the claimant has paid what he owes the respondent in costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
Mwacho v Sunflag Textile & Knit Wear Mills Limited (Cause 1890 of 2015) [2022] KEELRC 14663 (KLR) (6 October 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEELRC 14663 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Cause 1890 of 2015
M Mbaru, J
October 6, 2022
Between
Enock Mwacho
Claimant
and
Sunflag Textile & Knit Wear Mills Limited
Respondent
Ruling
1The respondent, Sunflag Textile & Knitwear Mills Limited filed application dated August 1, 2022 seeking for orders that the claimant be restrained from attaching the respondent’s property until the respondent’s party and party bill of costs is taxed and that the claimant’s due be deducted from the respondent’s costs herein after taxation of the respondent’s party and party bill of costs.
2The application is supported by the affidavit of Ateko Ivy Ingati advocate and on the grounds that judgement herein was delivered on June 6, 2022 in favour of the respondent with costs. The claimant was directed to collect his terminal dues amounting to Ksh 23,000. The party and party bill of costs is before the Deputy Registrar for taxation and the claimant has no known financial ability that he will be able to pay costs due to the respondent upon collection of his terminal dues.
3The claimant did not attend or respond to the instant application. Determination In the judgement of the court delivered on June 6, 2022 the suit was dismissed with costs to the respondent save the claimant was directed to collect his terminal dues owing from the respondent. such dues are stated to be Ksh 23,000. These facts are not contested.
4There is a valid judgement of the court and since, the Deputy Registrar has taxed the Party and Party Bill of Costs.
5Section 17(6) and (7) of the Employment Act , 2007 allow an employee to be paid his dues by the employer;
6. Notwithstanding the provisions of any law for the time being in force, whenever an attachment has been issued against the property of an employer in execution of a decree against him, the proceeds realised in pursuance of that execution shall not be paid by the court to a decree- holder until a decree obtained against the employer in respect of the wages of employees has been satisfied to the extent of a sum not exceeding six months’ wages of those employees.
7. Nothing in subsection (6) shall prevent an employee from recovering any balance due after such satisfaction, by ordinary process of law.
8Upon this right to be paid owed dues, an employer is allowed to deduct from an employee wages any monies owed following a Court Order such as herein pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(1)(f) of the Employment Act, 2007;
(1)Notwithstanding section 17(1), an employer may deduct from the// wages of his employee(f)any amount the deduction of which is authorised by any written law for the time being in force, collective agreement, wage determination, court order or arbitration award; 9on this basis, the judgement herein put into account, the respondent is justified to make a deduction of the owed terminal dues from the costs awarded, whichever is higher.
10Accordingly, application dated August 1, 2022 is hereby allowed to the extent that the claimant’s terminal dues of Ksh 23,000 shall be paid less what he owes the respondent in costs whichever is higher. Execution shall therefore not issue unless the claimant has paid what he owes the respondent in costs.
Each party shall bear own costs.
Delivered in court at Nairobi this 6th day of October, 2022. M. MBARŨ JUDGEIn the presence of:Court Assistant: Okodoi……………………………………………… and ……………………………………..