[2025] KEHC 8863 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 8863 (KLR)

The court found that the dispute raised by the petitioners concerning the imposition of a sewerage levy and the validity of the related Gazette Notice falls squarely within the jurisdiction of the Water Tribunal as established under Section 121 of the Water Act, 2016. The petitioners failed to exhaust the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 8863 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Michael Mwakazi & 67 others; Respondent: Tavevo Water and Sewerage Company; Respondent: Water Services Regulatory Board
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Voi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition E010 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
preliminary objection upheld; petition struck out for want of jurisdiction
Judges
AN Ongeri
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of High Court, Exhaustion of Alternative Remedies, Water Services Regulation
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Administrative Law Jurisdiction of High Court Exhaustion of Alternative Remedies Water Services Regulation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Mwakazi & 67 others

Applicant

Tavevo Water and Sewerage Company

Respondent

Water Services Regulatory Board

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear the petition in light of the dispute resolution mechanisms under the Water Act, 2016.
  2. 2 Whether the doctrine of exhaustion applies to disputes concerning water tariffs and levies imposed by water service providers.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the dispute raised by the petitioners concerning the imposition of a sewerage levy and the validity of the related Gazette Notice falls squarely within the jurisdiction of the Water Tribunal as established under Section 121 of the Water Act, 2016. The petitioners failed to exhaust the alternative dispute resolution mechanisms provided by the Act, such as lodging a complaint with the Water Services Regulatory Board or appealing to the Water Tribunal. The doctrine of exhaustion, as affirmed by the Court of Appeal in Geoffrey Muthiga Kabiru & 2 others v Samuel Munga Henry & 1756 others, requires parties to utilize available statutory mechanisms before approaching the...

Court Disposition

preliminary objection upheld; petition struck out for want of jurisdiction

Orders

  • The Notice of Preliminary Objection is upheld.
  • The petition is struck out for want of jurisdiction.