[2023] KEHC 20048 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 20048 (KLR)

The court found that since the ex parte judgment was entered before the respondent was served with the amended plaint, the trial court was correct in setting aside the judgment. The appellant has two options: proceed with the appeal against the ruling that set aside the judgment or return to the trial court, serve...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 20048 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Josiah Mwale; Respondent: Ali Cars Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 003 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Directions on Appeal and Case Management
Outcome
Appeal not determined on merits; matter remitted to trial court for fresh hearing.
Judges
AN Ongeri
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Judgment, Amended Pleadings, Service of Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Setting Aside Judgment Amended Pleadings Service of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Josiah Mwale

Appellant

Ali Cars Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Directions on Appeal and Case Management

  1. 1 Whether the trial court erred in setting aside the ex parte judgment entered on October 22, 2019.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant should proceed with the appeal or recommence proceedings in the trial court by serving the amended plaint.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since the ex parte judgment was entered before the respondent was served with the amended plaint, the trial court was correct in setting aside the judgment. The appellant has two options: proceed with the appeal against the ruling that set aside the judgment or return to the trial court, serve the amended plaint, allow the respondent to file an amended defence, and have the case heard afresh. Given the absence of a valid judgment on record, the court directed that the matter be remitted to the Chief Magistrate's Court for expedited hearing, in line with the constitutional imperative to avoid delay and technicalities.

Court Disposition

Appeal not determined on merits; matter remitted to trial court for fresh hearing.

Orders

  • The Deputy Registrar shall forward the file to the Chief Magistrate for hearing.
  • The Chief Magistrate is directed to expedite the hearing of the case.