[2001] KEHC 889 (KLR)
The High Court found that the conviction was supported by overwhelming and credible evidence, including the recovery of fresh meat and a cow's skin with the ranch's brand mark at the appellant's home, and the appellant's proximity to the scene of the theft. However, the sentence imposed by the lower court included...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] KEHC 889 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Mwaluko Kyalo; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyandarua
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 95 of ??
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed save for variation of sentence.
- Legal Topics
- Theft of Livestock, Sentencing Principles, Evidence Evaluation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mwaluko Kyalo
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the evidence adduced was sufficient and credible to sustain a conviction for theft of cattle under section 278 of the Penal Code.
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed by the lower court was lawful and appropriate.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court found that the conviction was supported by overwhelming and credible evidence, including the recovery of fresh meat and a cow's skin with the ranch's brand mark at the appellant's home, and the appellant's proximity to the scene of the theft. However, the sentence imposed by the lower court included hard labour, which is not provided for under section 278 of the Penal Code as amended. The court therefore set aside the portion of the sentence relating to hard labour and substituted the sentence with four years imprisonment and three strokes of the cane, considering that the appellant was a first offender and the ends of justice would still be served by a reduced sentence.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed save for variation of sentence.
Orders
- The sentence of seven years imprisonment with hard labour and three strokes of the cane is set aside.
- The appellant is sentenced to four years imprisonment and three strokes of the cane.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
11 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 95 OF 2000
(From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No. 475 of 1999 of the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court at Kitui: K. O. Ogola Esq. on 11. 11. 99)
MWALUKO KYALO ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: RESPONDENT
Coram: J. W. Mwera J. Appellant not present Orinda State Counsel for Respondent C.C.Muli ****************** J U D G E M E N T
20 The appellant was charged under S. 278 Penal Code in that on 2. 9.99 at B2 Ranch, Kanyonya sub location Kitui District he stole one head of cattle worth Sh.7000/=, the property of Julius Mutua. He was tried, convicted and sentenced to served 7 years imprisonment with hard labour plus three (3) strokes of the cane. It should be pointed out right away that S.278 Penal Code does not provide for hard labour (as amended by Act 22/87). He appealed saying that evidence against him was neither sufficient nor credible. That his defence was not well appreciated by the lower court. The Learned State Counsel supported the conviction but observed that the sentence may have been on the higher side.
From reviewing the whole lower court record, this court is satisfied that the conviction as on cogent and strong evidence. A brown colour from the ranch went missing. Benson Musyimi (P.W.2), Stephen Mwanzia (P.W.3) and A.P.C. Mutemi (P.W.5) visited the appellant’s home. 10 He lived close to the ranch. They found him cutting up large chunks of meat. They were intrigued and suspicious; they interrogated the appellant. He led them to a point he had buried a fresh brown cow’s skin which bore the brand mark of the ranch “C.I.Y”.
On all this evidence was overwhelming against the appellant. On the sentence 7 years plus strokes was a lawful sentence. Adding hard labour was not and that bit is set aside. The ranch had complained of many cattle thefts, so the prosecutor told the lower court. The appellant was a first offender. 20 In this court’s view ends of justice will still be served if the lower court sentence is set aside and substituted with one of four (4) yeas and three (3) strokes of the cane. Save for the variation in the sentence the appeal is dismissed.
Judgement accordingly.
Delivered on 2the July 2001.
J. W. MWERA
JUDGE