[2014] KEHC 232 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 232 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant, as a purported son of the deceased owner of the suit land, had established sufficient grounds for the grant of an inhibition order. The purpose of the order is to preserve the status quo and prevent any dealings with L. R. Nyambene/Antubetwe/858 until the substantive succession...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 232 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mwamati Mutuma M'limbine; Respondent: Rael Itura M'Ikanatha; Respondent: David Kainga M'limbine
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 51 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Inhibition Order
Outcome
Application for inhibition order allowed.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Inhibition Orders, Succession Disputes, Interlocutory Relief
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Inhibition Orders Succession Disputes Interlocutory Relief

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mwamati Mutuma M'limbine

Applicant

Rael Itura M'Ikanatha

Respondent

David Kainga M'limbine

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Inhibition Order

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an inhibition order over L. R. Nyambene/Antubetwe/858 pending determination of the succession cause.
  2. 2 Whether the application meets the threshold for grant of interlocutory inhibition orders.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant, as a purported son of the deceased owner of the suit land, had established sufficient grounds for the grant of an inhibition order. The purpose of the order is to preserve the status quo and prevent any dealings with L. R. Nyambene/Antubetwe/858 until the substantive succession cause is heard and determined. The respondents did not provide substantive opposition to the application. The court exercised its discretion to grant the inhibition order as sought, considering the need to protect the interests of all parties pending the outcome of the succession proceedings.

Court Disposition

Application for inhibition order allowed.

Orders

  • An order of inhibition is issued over L. R. Nyambene/Antubetwe/858 pending the hearing and determination of Meru High Court Succession Cause No. 506 of 2010.
  • Costs shall be in the cause.