[2024] KEHC 6798 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 6798 (KLR)

The court found that, in the absence of the children's mother and with the applicant being the only traceable parent, it is in the best interests of the children to allow communication with their father. The social inquiry report supported this, noting the children were agreeable to such contact, provided it is...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 6798 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Gadiel Yonakijiwa Mwanga; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions; Respondent: Director of Naima Children’s Home – Taveta
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Voi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E049 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Communication With Children
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
GMA Dulu
Legal Topics
Prisoners Rights, Parental Contact, Best Interests of Child, Children in Care
Source Language
en
Family and Children Criminal Law Prisoners Rights Parental Contact Best Interests of Child Children in Care

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gadiel Yonakijiwa Mwanga

Applicant

Director of Public Prosecutions

Respondent

Director of Naima Children’s Home – Taveta

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Communication With Children

  1. 1 Whether a prisoner serving life imprisonment is entitled to communicate with his children in a children’s home.
  2. 2 Whether such communication is in the best interests of the children under Article 53 of the Constitution and the Children’s Act.
  3. 3 Whether the court should grant supervised communication between the applicant and his children.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, in the absence of the children's mother and with the applicant being the only traceable parent, it is in the best interests of the children to allow communication with their father. The social inquiry report supported this, noting the children were agreeable to such contact, provided it is supervised. The court emphasized that the best interests of the child, as enshrined in Article 53 of the Constitution and the Children’s Act, override other considerations. Therefore, the application was allowed, granting the applicant supervised phone communication with his children at least three times a year.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The 2nd respondent (Director of Naima Children Home Taveta) is ordered to allow the applicant to communicate through mobile phone with his two children, Elizabeth Gadiel and Yona Gadiel.
  • The 2nd respondent is further ordered to allow the applicant to communicate with the children through mobile phone at least three times per year, subject to supervision and monitoring by the 2nd respondent.