[2025] KEHC 6000 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant, having pleaded guilty, shown remorse, acquired skills during incarceration, and received positive recommendations from the probation officer and community, was a suitable candidate for a non-custodial sentence. The court exercised its discretion to review the custodial sentence,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 6000 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Hillary Musera Mwanga; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2025
- Case Number
- Revision Case E432 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
- Outcome
- Custodial sentence reviewed and substituted with a probation order for seven months.
- Judges
- RN Nyakundi
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Revision, Probation Orders, Plea of Guilty, Mitigating Factors
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hillary Musera Mwanga
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the custodial sentence imposed on the applicant was excessive or unjust and should be revised.
- 2 Whether the applicant qualifies for a non-custodial sentence in the form of a probation order.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant, having pleaded guilty, shown remorse, acquired skills during incarceration, and received positive recommendations from the probation officer and community, was a suitable candidate for a non-custodial sentence. The court exercised its discretion to review the custodial sentence, noting the absence of previous convictions and the applicant's rehabilitation prospects. The custodial sentence was deemed excessive in the circumstances, and the interests of justice would be served by substituting it with a probation order for seven months.
Court Disposition
Custodial sentence reviewed and substituted with a probation order for seven months.
Orders
- The custodial sentence imposed on the applicant is set aside.
- The applicant is placed on probation for a period of seven months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Mwanga v Republic (Revision Case E432 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 6000 (KLR) (13 May 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 6000 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Eldoret
Revision Case E432 of 2024
RN Nyakundi, J
May 13, 2025
Between
Hillary Musera Mwanga
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. The Applicant was charged with an offence of Stealing contrary to Section 268 as read with Section 275 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the offence are that on the 2nd day of August 2024, at west market in Turbo subcounty within uasin Gishu County stole assorted Mitumba clothing and woolen caps all valued at Kshs 13,300 the property of SRAH WANGARI WAMBUI
2. The Applicant pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 2 years imprisonment for the 1st count and 6 months imprisonment for the 2nd count. The sentences are to run concurrently. In the instant application, the Applicant has moved the court to review the sentence and have it substituted with a probation order of 7 months.
3. The Probation Officer’s Report provides as follows: During his stint in prison, the offender has been engaged in farm work in Lumumba farm in Kiplombe. He specializes in planting flowers and maintaining them. He acquired basic farming skills from the farm work. He indicated that he intends to start a small business to make ends meet if he is released. The prison records indicate that the offender is fit for released. The family and community are willing to be part of the rehabilitation. The offender’s family is willing to welcome him back home and help with his reintegration, local administration did not oppose his released on a non-custodial sentence. The offender before this honorable court is remorseful and understands the magnitude of his offence. He pleads with the court to grant him a non-custodial sentence. He claims that he has learnt his lesson and he plans to find a stable job and focus on building himself. The offender before this honourable court is a 24-year-old man from soy sub-county. He is married and has 1 child. He used to do casual work of loading, offloading and selling clothes before his arrest. He is remorseful and pleads the court to offer him a chance at a non-custodial sentence.
4. In determining this question on revision of sentence, I rely on the following authorities. “ An appropriate sentence is a matter for the discretion of the sentencing judge. Each case presents its own facts upon which a judge exercises his discretion. It is the practice that as an appellate court his court will not normally interfere with the discretion of the sentencing judge unless the sentence is illegal, or unless court is satisfied that the sentence imposed by the trial judge was manifestly so excessive as to amount to an injustice Ogala s/o Owara v R (1954) 21 E.A.C.A 126 R v Mohamedali Jamal (1948) 15 E.A.C.A 126”
5. In the instant case in terms of Article 50 (2) (P) & (Q), 6(A) & (B) of the constitution as read conjunctively with Section 362 & 364 of the CPC the custodial sentence is reviewed and substituted with that of non-custodial of a probation order for 7 months having taken into account the elements of plea of guilty, the age of the offender, the nature of the offence, the mitigating factors, and that the Applicant has no previous conviction significant to this offence.
6. It is so ordered
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND THE SEAL OF THIS COURT THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY 2025. ..........................R. NYAKUNDIJUDGE