[2004] KEHC 485 (KLR)
The court held that under Section 48 of the Advocates Act, execution of a taxed advocate/client bill of costs cannot lawfully proceed before the filing and service of a substantive suit. The respondent failed to provide evidence that such a suit had been filed and served. Consequently, the court found the process of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] KEHC 485 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mwangangi & Co. Advocate; Respondent: Peter Muli Maingi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Miscellaneous 50 of 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Filing of Substantive Suit
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Advocate Client Costs, Taxation of Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mwangangi & Co. Advocate
Applicant
Peter Muli Maingi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Filing of Substantive Suit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether execution of a taxed advocate/client bill of costs can proceed before the filing and service of a substantive suit as required by law.
- 2 Whether the absence of a substantive suit contravenes Section 48 of the Advocates Act and justifies a stay of execution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that under Section 48 of the Advocates Act, execution of a taxed advocate/client bill of costs cannot lawfully proceed before the filing and service of a substantive suit. The respondent failed to provide evidence that such a suit had been filed and served. Consequently, the court found the process of execution initiated by the respondent to be illegal and ordered a stay of execution of the taxed costs until a substantive suit is filed. The application for stay was therefore allowed with costs to the applicant.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Stay of execution of the taxed costs granted until a substantive suit is filed by the respondent against the applicant.
- Costs of the application awarded to the applicant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
12 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MACHAKOS CIVIL MISC. NO. 50 OF 2001
MWANGANGI & CO. ADVOCATE………………………APPLICANT VERSUS PETER MULI MAINGI………………………………RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
By notice of motion dated 6. 11. 2003 the applicant seeks orders of stay of execution of the order of taxation herein pending the filing of substantive suit by the applicant/respondent.
The application is based on grounds that the applicant/respondent is in the process of taking court execution proceedings and yet no substantive suit has been filed and served upon respondent/applicant in respect of the taxed Advocate/client bill of costs and that absence of the suit contravenes Section 48 of advocates act and respondent/applicant will suffer substantial loss if execution proceeds.
The application was also supported by affidavit of Peter Muli Maingi in which he depones that he engaged the Applicant/Respondent to act for him in HCCC 219/97, he was awarded damages but the company was wound up and advocate lodged his bill for taxation which was done and he has been unable to pay the legal fees of 65,000/= and the respondent is in the process of taking out execution proceedings with a view to attaching his property and yet no substantive suit has been filed against him.
The applicant respondent did not file any replying affidavit or grounds of opposition.She however addressed court and told court that a suit has been filed and served to respondent. The court was not given the number of the case file. Even if that be the case the respondent cannot apply for execution before the filing of a suit as per provisions of section 48 of the advocates Act. No execution can take place before a substantive suit is filed against the applicant. I do see that application for execution of decree was filed in court on 18. 11. 2003. The process of execution is illegal and the court will order a stay of the taxed costs till a substantive suit is filed by respondent against the applicant. Application is allowed with costs to the applicant.
Right of appeal 14 days.
Dated, read and delivered at Machakos this 12th day of February, 2004.
R. WENDOH
JUDGE