[2023] KEELC 18850 (KLR)
The court found that the order barring Mr Jason Ondabu Advocate from representing the Defendants in ELC No 329 of 2017, made on June 12, 2020, was issued after the consolidation of ELC No 329 of 2017, ELC No 359 of 2011, and Succession Cause No 28 of 2009. Since the suits were consolidated and ordered to be heard...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEELC 18850 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Esther Mbula Mwangangi; Defendant: Nelson Mutisya Muunda; Defendant: Daniel Ongeri Ongera; Defendant: Ruth Moraa Ongera; Interested Party: Ngurish Investment Limited; Interested Party: Icipe Staff Housing Co-Operative
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 329 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Ruling / Application to Bar Advocate From Acting for Defendants in Consolidated Suits
- Outcome
- Application to bar Mr Jason Ondabu from acting for the Defendants in the consolidated suits is allowed.
- Judges
- A Nyukuri
- Legal Topics
- Advocate Conflict of Interest, Consolidation of Suits, Representation Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Esther Mbula Mwangangi
Plaintiff
Nelson Mutisya Muunda
Defendant
Daniel Ongeri Ongera
Defendant
Ruth Moraa Ongera
Defendant
Ngurish Investment Limited
Interested Party
Icipe Staff Housing Co-Operative
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Ruling / Application to Bar Advocate From Acting for Defendants in Consolidated Suits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Jason Ondabu Advocate should be barred from representing the Defendants in the consolidated suits due to conflict of interest.
- 2 Whether the previous order barring Mr Ondabu from acting in ELC No 329 of 2017 extends to the other consolidated suits.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the order barring Mr Jason Ondabu Advocate from representing the Defendants in ELC No 329 of 2017, made on June 12, 2020, was issued after the consolidation of ELC No 329 of 2017, ELC No 359 of 2011, and Succession Cause No 28 of 2009. Since the suits were consolidated and ordered to be heard together, the bar on Mr Ondabu's representation necessarily applies to all three suits. The court rejected Mr Ondabu's argument that the bar was limited to ELC No 329 of 2017, holding that it would be illogical and impractical for him to appear in some but not all of the consolidated matters. The court reaffirmed the principle that an advocate who may be called as a witness...
Court Disposition
Application to bar Mr Jason Ondabu from acting for the Defendants in the consolidated suits is allowed.
Orders
- Mr Jason Ondabu Advocate is barred from appearing for the Defendants in Machakos ELC No 329 of 2017, ELC No 359 of 2011, and Succession Cause No 28 of 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
Mwangangi v Muunda & 2 others; Ngurish Investment Limited & another (Interested Parties) (Environment & Land Case 329 of 2017) [2023] KEELC 18850 (KLR) (12 July 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEELC 18850 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Machakos
Environment & Land Case 329 of 2017
A Nyukuri, J
July 12, 2023
Between
Esther Mbula Mwangangi
Plaintiff
and
Nelson Mutisya Muunda
1st Defendant
Daniel Ongeri Ongera
2nd Defendant
Ruth Moraa Ongera
3rd Defendant
and
Ngurish Investment Limited
Interested Party
Icipe Staff Housing Co-Operative
Interested Party
Ruling
1. On May 17, 2023 when this matter came up for mention, Mr Mungai, counsel for the Plaintiff and first Interested Party sought that Mr Ondabu Advocate appearing for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Defendants should not be allowed to act for the Defendants in this matter on the basis that on June 12, 2020, this court barred him from acting for the Defendants in this matter. Mr Ondabu stated that he had been barred to act in this matter and not in the other suits that have been consolidated with this suit.
2. I have considered the ruling of this court made on June 12, 2020. That ruling was delivered pursuant to a Notice of Motion dated February 21, 2018 filed by the Plaintiff and the 1st Interested Party seeking for an order to bar Mr Jason Ondabu acting for the Defendant and for leave to call the said advocate as a witness in this matter. Subsequently, this court held that Mr Jason Ondabu Advocate cannot represent the Defendants in this case without falling into the danger of being conflicted. The court therefore barred Mr Jason Ondabu Advocate from appearing for the Defendants in this suit.
3. This suit is related to Machakos High Court P & A No 28 of 2009 and Machakos ELC No 359 of 2011. On April 10, 2018, this court made an order consolidating Machakos ELC No 359 of 2011, Machakos Succession Cause No 28 of 2009 and Machakos ELC 329 of 2017 and an order that the suits be heard together. As the order to have the three suits herein consolidated and heard together was made on April 10, 2018, and the order barring Mr Jason Ondabu to appear for the Defendants herein was made on June 12, 2020, the decision having been made after the consolidated and the suit having been ordered to be heard together, it follows that Mr Jason Ondabu was effectively barred from appearing in all the three suits consolidated herein and his argument that he was only barred to appear in ELC No 329 of 2017 and not the other two suits stated hereinabove is rejected. In any event, the three suits shall be heard together and therefore he cannot possibly appear in one suit and not the other when the suits have been consolidated and ordered to be heard together.
4. In the premises, I find and hold that Mr Jason Ondabu is barred from appearing for the Defendants in the three consolidated suits herein namely Machakos ELC No 329 of 2017, ELC No 359 of 2011 and Succession No 28 of 2009.
5. Orders accordingly.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MACHAKOS VIRTUALLY THIS 12TH DAY OF JULY, 2023 THROUGH MICROSOFT TEAMS VIDEO CONFERENCING PLATFORMA. NYUKURIJUDGEIn the Presence of;Mr. Mungai for Plaintiff and 1st Interested PartyMr. Mocha for 2nd Interested PartyNo appearance for DefendantsAbdisalam – Court Assistant