[2024] KEELRC 1894 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent's application to set aside the judgment had been dismissed, and the sum of Kshs. 426,056 deposited in court as a condition for stay of execution was no longer subject to any pending challenge. The respondent did not oppose the claimant's application for release of the funds. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELRC 1894 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Ferdinard Lenjo Mwangemi; Respondent: Mawingo Construction 2010 Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 235 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Post Judgment Application for Release of Deposited Decretal Sum
- Outcome
- application allowed in part
- Judges
- AK Nzei
- Legal Topics
- Judgment Enforcement, Stay of Execution, Release of Decretal Sum
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ferdinard Lenjo Mwangemi
Applicant
Mawingo Construction 2010 Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Post Judgment Application for Release of Deposited Decretal Sum
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sum of Kshs. 426,056 deposited in court by the respondent should be released to the claimant's advocates.
- 2 Whether the respondent should bear the costs of the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent's application to set aside the judgment had been dismissed, and the sum of Kshs. 426,056 deposited in court as a condition for stay of execution was no longer subject to any pending challenge. The respondent did not oppose the claimant's application for release of the funds. The court therefore held that the claimant was entitled to unconditional release of the deposited sum through his advocates. On costs, the court exercised its discretion and ordered each party to bear its own costs of the application.
Court Disposition
application allowed in part
Orders
- The sum of Kshs. 426,056 deposited in court by the respondent on 6/12/2022 shall be released unconditionally to IRB Mbuya & Company Advocates on behalf of the claimant.
- Each party shall bear its own costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Mwangemi v Mawingo Construction 2010 Limited (Cause 235 of 2015) [2024] KEELRC 1894 (KLR) (18 July 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELRC 1894 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Cause 235 of 2015
AK Nzei, J
July 18, 2024
Between
Ferdinard Lenjo Mwangemi
Claimant
and
Mawingo Construction 2010 Limited
Respondent
Ruling
1. Judgment in this matter is shown to have been delivered on 7th July 2021 (Rika J,). The Claimant is shown to have been awarded kshs. 426,056 and costs of the suit.
2. On 1/11/2022, the Respondent filed a Notice of Motion dated 10/11/2021 seeking, inter-alia, setting aside of this Court’s aforesaid judgment . On 14/11/2022, I ordered the Respondent to deposit the entire decretal sum in Court within fourteen (14) days of the order as a condition to interim stay of execution pending hearing and determination of its aforesaid application. The Court’s record herein shows that a sum of kshs. 426,056 was deposited in this Court on 6/12/2022.
3. The Respondent’s said Notice of Motion dated 10/11/2021, which the Claimant had opposed, was eventually considered by this Court and was dismissed vide this Court’s Ruling delivered on 25/5/2023.
4. Subsequently, the Claimant filed a Notice of Motion dated 13/5/2024 seeking the following orders:-a.That the Court be pleased to order that the amount of kshs. 426,056 deposited in Court by the Respondent/Judgment Debtor on 6/12/2022 be unconditionally released to the Firm of IRB Mbuya & Company Advocates on behalf of the Claimant/Judgment Creditor.b.That the Respondent/Judgment Debtor do bear the costs of the application.
5. The said application, which is the application before me, is based on the supporting affidavit of Clara Wanyama Advocate sworn on 13/5/2024. The application, though shown to have been duly served on the Respondent’s Advocates and an affidavit of service filed, is not opposed by the Respondent as no response to the application is shown to have been filed.
6. The Claimant’s said Notice of Motion dated 13/5/2024 is hereby allowed in the following terms:-a.the sum of kshs, 426,056 deposited in this Court by the Respondent/Judgment Debtor on 6/12/2022 shall be released unconditionally to the Firm of IRB Mbuya & Company Advocates on behalf of the Claimant/Judgment Creditor.b.each party shall bear its own costs of the application.
7. Orders accordingly.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MOMBASA THIS 18TH July 2024AGNES KITIKU NZEIJUDGEORDERThis Ruling has been delivered via Microsoft Teams Online Platform. A signed copy will be availed to each party upon payment of the applicable Court fees.AGNES KITIKU NZEIJUDGEAppearance:…………………….Claimant……………………Respondent