[2024] KEHC 14148 (KLR)
The court found that the prosecution had established compelling reasons to deny bail. The accused had no fixed place of abode, had previously escaped from lawful custody twice, and his relatives were unwilling to accommodate him. The seriousness of the murder charges and the potential for a lengthy sentence if...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 14148 (KLR)
- Parties
- Accused: Ezekiel Sakwa Mwangi alias Kwame; Prosecution: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Case E032 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Application
- Outcome
- bail denied
- Judges
- JM Nang'ea
- Legal Topics
- Bail and Bond, Compelling Reasons, Flight Risk, Presumption of Innocence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ezekiel Sakwa Mwangi alias Kwame
Accused
Republic
Prosecution
Procedural Posture
Criminal Case / Ruling on Bail Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused should be released on bail pending trial for murder charges.
- 2 Whether the prosecution has established compelling reasons to deny bail as required by Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the prosecution had established compelling reasons to deny bail. The accused had no fixed place of abode, had previously escaped from lawful custody twice, and his relatives were unwilling to accommodate him. The seriousness of the murder charges and the potential for a lengthy sentence if convicted provided a strong incentive for the accused to abscond. The accused did not rebut these claims. On the balance of probabilities, the court was satisfied that the risk of flight and the lack of a stable environment constituted compelling reasons to deny bail, in line with constitutional and judicial standards.
Court Disposition
bail denied
Orders
- The application for release of the accused on bond/bail is rejected.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Mwangi alias Kwame v Republic (Criminal Case E032 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 14148 (KLR) (14 November 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 14148 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nakuru
Criminal Case E032 of 2024
JM Nang'ea, J
November 14, 2024
Between
Ezekiel Sakwa Mwangi alias Kwame
Accused
and
Republic
Prosecution
Ruling
1. On 19/9/2024 the accused herein was arraigned before this court charged with four (4) counts of Murder Contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the offences state that on various dates and at various places within Nakuru County, he murdered Alice Ayuma, Virginia Njeri Mwangi, Florence Mueni Mwalimu and Vellah Moraa Mogambi.. He pleaded not guilty to the charges.
2. The defence Counse (Mr. Omwansa) subsequently applied for release of the accused on bail pursuant to Article 49(1) (h) of the Constitution stating inter alia that he is a form 1 student. Counsel submitted that in terms of Article 50(2) (a) of the Constitution the accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
3. The prosecution Counsel opposed the application relying on the affidavit evidence presentend by the case Investigang Officer (Cpl Vincent Lang’at). The officer avers in the affidavit that the accused is a flight risk as he has no fixed place of abode and his relatives are not ready to accomodate him. It is alleged that he disappeared after allegedly committing the murders and further that he had twice escaped from custody at Kimumu Probation Hostel Centre Eldoret, where he was serving a 1 year probation sentence.
4. The court is also told that the offences charged are serious and could result in long prison sentences, hence an incentive by the accused to flex.
5. Learned Counsel for the prosecution and the defence filed written submissions which I have also perused. Indeed Article 49(1) (h) provides that an accused person has the right to be released on bond/bail on reasonable terms unless compelling reasons are given that militate against his release [(also see Case Law in Joklam Mayende & 3 Others 2012) eKLR (Republic vs Sifuna (2023) eKLR cited by the defence Counsel.
6. As also submitted by the Prosecuting Counsel citing the judicial determination in Michael Juma Oyamo & Another vs Repblic (2019) bond/bail is not denied on flimsy grounds but real and cogent grounds. The primary consideration in all cases, however, is whether the accused will turn up for trial. In making this determination the court considers inter alia the nature of the charge and seriousness of punishment upon conviction as these factors could motivate the accused to abscond. (see Manuna vs Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application 19 of 2023) [2023] KEHC 17221 (KLR) (9 May 2023) (Ruling) and Republic vs Oonde & Another (Criminal Case E018 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 9000 (KLR) (25 July 2024) (Ruling).
7. The Probation Officer filed a Pre-bail Report stating that the accused has no fixed place of a board and twice escaped from Kimumu Probation Hostel Centre, Eldoret, where he was undergoing rehabilitation after conviction for the offence of stealing. His father is also reported to have stated that he had run away from home.
8. The accused has not rebutted these claims. Further considering that he faces serious charges that attract stiff sentences if convicted, I find that these are compelling reasons to deny bail/bond. The prosecution has shown on a balance of probability that there exist compelling reasons to dismiss the application.
9. In the result the application for release of the accused on bond/bail is rejected.
J. M. NANG’EA, JUDGE.RULING DELIVERED THIS 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 IN THE PRESENCE OF:The state, Ms SangAdvocate for the accused, Ms OmwansaAccused, presentJ. M. NANG’EA, JUDGE.