[2012] KECA 120 (KLR)

[2012] KECA 120 (KLR)

The Court found that the applicants failed to demonstrate that the intended appeal was arguable, as there was no valid notice of appeal on record and no draft memorandum of appeal annexed to show the merits of the intended appeal. The Court further held that since the application was for a stay of a negative order...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] KECA 120 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mwangi Gathaiyu; Applicant: Muiruri Njoroge; Applicant: Mbuthia Kahiga; Respondent: Kamau Ngure
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 230 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Intended Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to the respondent
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Appeals Process, Eviction Orders, Review of Judgment
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Stay of Execution Appeals Process Eviction Orders Review of Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mwangi Gathaiyu

Applicant

Muiruri Njoroge

Applicant

Mbuthia Kahiga

Applicant

Kamau Ngure

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Intended Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have demonstrated sufficient grounds for grant of stay of execution pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the intended appeal is arguable and not frivolous.
  3. 3 Whether a negative order (dismissal) is capable of being stayed.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the applicants failed to demonstrate that the intended appeal was arguable, as there was no valid notice of appeal on record and no draft memorandum of appeal annexed to show the merits of the intended appeal. The Court further held that since the application was for a stay of a negative order (dismissal), there was nothing to stay. Consequently, the application for stay of execution was dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to the respondent

Orders

  • The application for stay of execution is dismissed.
  • Costs of the application are awarded to the respondent.