[2001] KECA 318 (KLR)

[2001] KECA 318 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay in filing the notice of appeal. Since the respondent did not object to the application, and the applicant has an undoubted right of appeal, the court exercised its discretion to grant the extension. The notice of appeal lodged...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] KECA 318 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mwangi Kamau; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 16 of ??
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Right of Appeal, Criminal Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Extension of Time Right of Appeal Criminal Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mwangi Kamau

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file a notice of appeal out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay in filing the notice of appeal. Since the respondent did not object to the application, and the applicant has an undoubted right of appeal, the court exercised its discretion to grant the extension. The notice of appeal lodged on 18th December, 2000 was deemed to have been filed in time, and the registry was directed to prepare the record of appeal expeditiously.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • The notice of appeal lodged in the superior court on 18th December, 2000 is deemed to be filed in time.
  • The Registry is directed to prepare the record of appeal expeditiously.