[2022] KEHC 11808 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 11808 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had established, through the supporting affidavit and annexed certificates of costs, that the respondent owed the certified sums as taxed by the court in various miscellaneous applications. There was no evidence of payment or challenge to the certificates by the respondent. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 11808 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mwangi Njenga & Company Advocates; Respondent: County Government of Mombasa
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 77 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Outcome
application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for certified costs plus interest and costs of the application
Judges
OA Sewe
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Fees, Enforcement of Certificates of Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Advocate Client Fees Enforcement of Certificates of Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mwangi Njenga & Company Advocates

Applicant

County Government of Mombasa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Judgment on Taxed Costs

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to judgment for the sum certified in the certificates of costs issued in various miscellaneous applications.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has failed to satisfy the certificates of costs despite service.
  3. 3 Whether the court should consolidate the various taxed matters for expedient disposal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had established, through the supporting affidavit and annexed certificates of costs, that the respondent owed the certified sums as taxed by the court in various miscellaneous applications. There was no evidence of payment or challenge to the certificates by the respondent. The court held that under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, it was justified to enter judgment for the applicant for the total sum certified, together with interest at court rates from the date of the ruling until full payment. The court also found it appropriate to consolidate the various taxed matters for expedient disposal and awarded costs of the application to the applicant.

Court Disposition

application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for certified costs plus interest and costs of the application

Orders

  • The various taxed matters between the applicant and respondent are consolidated for expedient disposal.
  • Judgment is entered in favour of the applicant for Kshs 8,102,045.53 together with interest at court rates from the date of the ruling until full payment.