[2024] KEHC 8471 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 8471 (KLR)

The court held that since the judgment debtor did not file any affidavit in opposition to the application, the oral submissions made by counsel could not be considered as valid opposition. The application was therefore unopposed. The court further held that issues raised regarding the subdivision of the property and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 8471 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Josphat Njoroge Mwangi; Respondent: Home Africa Communities Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application E742 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Post Judgment Execution Application
Outcome
Application allowed; auctioneer permitted to execute for the balance of the decretal sum.
Judges
A Mabeya
Legal Topics
Execution of Decree, Attachment of Property, Auctioneer Authorisation
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Execution of Decree Attachment of Property Auctioneer Authorisation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Josphat Njoroge Mwangi

Applicant

Home Africa Communities Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Post Judgment Execution Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to orders permitting an identified auctioneer to execute the balance of the decretal sum.
  2. 2 Whether opposition by the judgment debtor without filing affidavits is valid.
  3. 3 Whether issues regarding subdivision of the property and payments made should prevent execution at this stage.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since the judgment debtor did not file any affidavit in opposition to the application, the oral submissions made by counsel could not be considered as valid opposition. The application was therefore unopposed. The court further held that issues raised regarding the subdivision of the property and payments made are matters to be addressed before the Deputy Registrar at the stage of settling the terms of sale, not at this stage of execution. The court found the application meritorious and allowed the identified auctioneer to proceed with execution for the balance of the decretal sum, subject to compliance with the relevant provisions of Order 22 of the Civil Procedure...

Court Disposition

Application allowed; auctioneer permitted to execute for the balance of the decretal sum.

Orders

  • The application dated 17/3/2024 is allowed.
  • The identified auctioneer is permitted to execute for the balance of the decretal sum of Kshs. 9,462,727/=.