[2025] KECPT 284 (KLR)
The Tribunal found that while the claimant had established her membership and made a demand for refund, she had not yet provided sufficient documentary evidence of the actual deductions or the precise amount claimed. The respondent did not dispute the claimant's membership or the sum but cited financial difficulties...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KECPT 284 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mary Muthoni Mwangi; Respondent: Metropolitan National Sacco Limited
- Court
- Cooperative Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case 779/E1042 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Judgment With Directions for Further Evidence
- Outcome
- Interlocutory orders issued; final judgment deferred pending further evidence.
- Judges
- BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
- Legal Topics
- Member Refunds, Sacco Liability, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Muthoni Mwangi
Applicant
Metropolitan National Sacco Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Judgment With Directions for Further Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to a refund of her savings from the respondent Sacco.
- 2 Whether the claimant has sufficiently proved her claim on a balance of probabilities.
- 3 Whether the respondent's financial challenges justify delay in payment.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that while the claimant had established her membership and made a demand for refund, she had not yet provided sufficient documentary evidence of the actual deductions or the precise amount claimed. The respondent did not dispute the claimant's membership or the sum but cited financial difficulties as the reason for non-payment. The Tribunal, prioritizing substantive justice over technicalities, ordered the claimant to file her statement of account and proof of deductions within seven days to enable a fair determination. The matter was adjourned for final judgment, with similar orders to apply in related cases.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory orders issued; final judgment deferred pending further evidence.
Orders
- Claimant to file statement of account and proof of deductions within 7 days.
- Judgment scheduled for 29.4.2025.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Mwangi v Metropolitan National Sacco Limited (Tribunal Case 779/E1042 of 2023) [2025] KECPT 284 (KLR) (5 May 2025) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2025] KECPT 284 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Cooperative Tribunal
Tribunal Case 779/E1042 of 2023
BM Kimemia, Chair, Janet Mwatsama, Vice Chair, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw & PO Aol, Members
May 5, 2025
Between
Mary Muthoni Mwangi
Claimant
and
Metropolitan National Sacco Limited
Respondent
Judgment
1. Matter for determination is Statement of Claim dated 20. 11. 2023 filed on 21. 11. 2023. The Claimant avers she is a member of Respondent member number 11843. She says she had savings of Kshs. 490,851. 29 she wished to withdraw from Respondent and on 17. 1.2023 she withdraw from being a member of Respondent.The Respondent have not refunded the Claimant and claimant’s prayers are for:a.The sum of Kshs. 490,851. 29/=b.Interest at commercial rates of 14% per annum from 17th January 2023 until judgment or at such rate and for such period as the tribunal thinks fit.
2. Claimant filed her Witness Statement dated 20. 11. 2023 and List of Documents dated 20. 11. 2023 on 21. 11. 2023. Respondent filed Statement of Defence dated 22. 12. 2023 on 11. 3.2025. Matter being one of refunds the tribunal opted for the same to be canvassed by way of written submissions claimant filed written submissions and Respondent filed their written submissions on 24. 9.2024 which are dated 19. 9.2024.
3. Having looked into the pleadings the issue to be determined is whether the Claimant is entitled to their refund.The claimant stated she was a member and rightly gave her membership number. The Respondent did not deny her membership neither that she had saved the said amount. The respondent in paragraph states the society has been through so much turmoil, financial challenges and is overwhelmed and seeks for time to make payment in a more structured approach to handle the outstanding matters.The question there is-Has the Claimant sufficiently proved her claim on balance of probability?The Claimant has only filed her demand letter and her letter dated 17. 1.2023 .This only evidence the demand and not her being a member on that deductions were made.
4. We note the matter being one of refund, was to be canvassed by way of written submissions. It is for this reason we find it that Claimant may not have been able to adduce evidence. The Tribunal being on that is not bound by technicalities. We involve Order 16 Rule 1 Civil Procedure Rule.“at any time before the trial conference under order II the parties may obtain on application to the court or to such officer as it appoints on his behalf, summons to persons whose attendance is required either to give evidence or to produce document….” to enable us make a fair determination of the matter herein.
Tribunal order 1. Claimant to file their Statement of Account and proof of deductions 7 days from today.
2. Judgment on 29. 4.2025.
3. Orders to apply in E1043/2023 and E648/2023.
JUDGMENT SIGNED, DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI THIS 5TH DAY OF MAY, 2025. HON. B. KIMEMIA CHAIRPERSON SIGNED 5. 5.2025HON. J. MWATSAMA DEPUTY CHAIRPERSON SIGNED 5. 5.2025HON. BEATRICE SAWE MEMBER SIGNED 5. 5.2025HON. FRIDAH LOTUIYA MEMBER SIGNED 5. 5.2025HON. PHILIP GICHUKI MEMBER SIGNED 5. 5.2025HON. MICHAEL CHESIKAW MEMBER SIGNED 5. 5.2025HON. P. AOL MEMBER SIGNED 5. 5.2025TRIBUNAL CLERK MUTAIChacha advocate holding brief for Mr. Kanyoro advocate for the Claimant.Gitonga Muriuki advocate for the Respondent -No appearanceHON. J. MWATSAMA DEPUTY CHAIRPERSON SIGNED 5. 5.2025