[2025] KECPT 287 (KLR)

[2025] KECPT 287 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had provided credible documentary evidence of her deposits with the Respondent Sacco, specifically a payslip and account statement as at December 2021. The Respondent failed to file any substantive evidence to rebut the Claimant's claim, relying instead on general denials and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECPT 287 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mary Muthoni Mwangi; Respondent: Metropolitan National Sacco Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 779/E1042 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the Claimant for Kshs. 490,851.29 plus costs and interest.
Judges
BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Sacco Member Deposits, Account Statement Disputes, Monetary Claims
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Sacco Member Deposits Account Statement Disputes Monetary Claims

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mary Muthoni Mwangi

Applicant

Metropolitan National Sacco Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant is entitled to the sum of Kshs. 490,851.29 as claimed from the Respondent Sacco.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent's defence and submissions rebut the Claimant's documentary evidence.
  3. 3 Whether costs and interest should be awarded to the Claimant.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had provided credible documentary evidence of her deposits with the Respondent Sacco, specifically a payslip and account statement as at December 2021. The Respondent failed to file any substantive evidence to rebut the Claimant's claim, relying instead on general denials and reference to an ongoing inquiry. The Tribunal held that the burden of proof lay with the Claimant, who had discharged it, and that the Respondent's defence was insufficient. Judgment was therefore entered in favour of the Claimant for the sum of Kshs. 490,851.29 plus costs and interest.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the Claimant for Kshs. 490,851.29 plus costs and interest.

Orders

  • Judgment entered in favour of the Claimant against the Respondent for Kshs. 490,851.29.
  • The Respondent shall pay costs of the suit to the Claimant.