[2025] KECPT 226 (KLR)

[2025] KECPT 226 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had sufficiently demonstrated her membership in the Respondent Sacco through her membership number and the unchallenged member statement of account. The Respondent did not dispute the authenticity of the statement or the Claimant's membership. The Claimant's statement of account...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECPT 226 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jane Wairimu Mwangi; Respondent: Metropolitan National Sacco Ltd
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 500/E365 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Judges
BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Sacco Member Refunds, Breach of Constitution, Deposit Recovery
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Sacco Member Refunds Breach of Constitution Deposit Recovery

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jane Wairimu Mwangi

Applicant

Metropolitan National Sacco Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant was a member of the Respondent Sacco.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent owes the Claimant a refund of Kshs. 685,831.49.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had sufficiently demonstrated her membership in the Respondent Sacco through her membership number and the unchallenged member statement of account. The Respondent did not dispute the authenticity of the statement or the Claimant's membership. The Claimant's statement of account showed a balance of Ksh. 685,831.49 as at 30/9/2022, which the Respondent had not refunded. The Tribunal rejected the Respondent's arguments regarding suspension of refunds and ongoing turmoil, noting that no legal basis was provided to withhold the Claimant's funds. The Tribunal concluded that the Claimant was entitled to the refund, interest, and costs as prayed.

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • The Respondent shall pay the Claimant Ksh. 685,831.49.
  • The Respondent shall pay interest at 14% per annum from the date of filing until payment in full.