[2024] KEELC 6659 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 6659 (KLR)

The court held that the applicant was entitled to withdraw the suit/application under Order 25 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, as the notice of withdrawal was filed before the matter was set down for hearing and no directions had been given. Although the suit was initiated by way of a miscellaneous application,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 6659 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: John Kibiribiri Mwangi; Respondent: Abdulai Shulie; Respondent: Director of Criminal Investigations; Respondent: Chief Land Registrar, Nairobi; Defendant: Unknown (4th Defendant)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case E075 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Withdrawal of Suit
Outcome
suit withdrawn
Judges
MD Mwangi
Legal Topics
Withdrawal of Suit, Miscellaneous Applications, Land Title Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Withdrawal of Suit Miscellaneous Applications Land Title Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Kibiribiri Mwangi

Plaintiff

Abdulai Shulie

Respondent

Director of Criminal Investigations

Respondent

Chief Land Registrar, Nairobi

Respondent

Unknown (4th Defendant)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Withdrawal of Suit

  1. 1 Whether the applicant was entitled to withdraw the suit/application before the matter was set down for hearing.
  2. 2 Whether the provisions of Order 25 of the Civil Procedure Rules apply to miscellaneous applications.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the applicant was entitled to withdraw the suit/application under Order 25 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, as the notice of withdrawal was filed before the matter was set down for hearing and no directions had been given. Although the suit was initiated by way of a miscellaneous application, the court found that the provisions of Order 25 could be applied with necessary modifications. Accordingly, the matter was marked as withdrawn and no orders as to costs were made.

Court Disposition

suit withdrawn

Orders

  • The suit/application is marked as withdrawn.
  • No orders as to costs.