[2022] KEHC 16718 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 16718 (KLR)

The court found that only the garnishee application dated September 19, 2022, is pending, as the recusal application had already been determined and the matter reallocated. The court rejected the Plaintiff's argument that the Judgment Debtor has no right to respond, holding that Order 23 of the Civil Procedure Rules...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 16718 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Lucy Wairimu Mwangi; Defendant: Monica Jackline Wambui; Defendant: Pauline Mukuhi Nganga; Garnishee: Chege Wainaina & Co. Advocates
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Commercial Case 185 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Directions on Pending Garnishee Application
Outcome
Directions issued; Defendants granted leave to respond to garnishee application; no final orders on garnishee application at this stage.
Judges
DO Chepkwony
Legal Topics
Garnishee Proceedings, Execution of Judgment, Recusal of Judge
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Garnishee Proceedings Execution of Judgment Recusal of Judge

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lucy Wairimu Mwangi

Plaintiff

Monica Jackline Wambui

Defendant

Pauline Mukuhi Nganga

Defendant

Chege Wainaina & Co. Advocates

Garnishee

Procedural Posture

Commercial Case / Directions on Pending Garnishee Application

  1. 1 Whether there are two pending applications (recusal and garnishee) or only the garnishee application remains for determination.
  2. 2 Whether the defendants (judgment debtors) have a right to respond to the garnishee application under Order 23 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  3. 3 Whether the garnishee order should be made absolute at this stage.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that only the garnishee application dated September 19, 2022, is pending, as the recusal application had already been determined and the matter reallocated. The court rejected the Plaintiff's argument that the Judgment Debtor has no right to respond, holding that Order 23 of the Civil Procedure Rules presupposes the Judgment Debtor's right to address the court on the correctness and propriety of the execution proceedings. Accordingly, the court granted the Defendants an opportunity to file responses to the garnishee application within fourteen days, with subsequent directions for written submissions by both parties. The application to make the garnishee order absolute was...

Court Disposition

Directions issued; Defendants granted leave to respond to garnishee application; no final orders on garnishee application at this stage.

Orders

  • Defendants to file responses to the application dated September 19, 2022 within fourteen (14) days from the date hereof.
  • Parties to canvass the application by way of written submissions.