[2022] KEELC 916 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 916 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant, Henry Waweru Mwangi, was not a party to the suit as no application for substitution was made within one year of the plaintiff's death, as required by Order 24 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The suit had therefore abated, and the applicant, despite being a legal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 916 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Mwangi Waweru; Applicant: Henry Waweru Mwangi; Defendant: Esther Kagure
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 211 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Application for Eviction Order
Outcome
Application struck out with costs to the defendant.
Judges
JO Olola
Legal Topics
Locus Standi, Abatement of Suit, Eviction Orders, Legal Representatives, Order 24 Civil Procedure Rules
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Locus Standi Abatement of Suit Eviction Orders Legal Representatives Order 24 Civil Procedure Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mwangi Waweru

Plaintiff

Henry Waweru Mwangi

Applicant

Esther Kagure

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Application for Eviction Order

  1. 1 Whether the applicant, not being a party to the suit, has locus standi to seek eviction orders against the defendant.
  2. 2 Whether the suit abated upon the death of the plaintiff and no substitution within the prescribed period under Order 24 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  3. 3 Whether any orders can be granted in favour of the applicant in the absence of proper substitution.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant, Henry Waweru Mwangi, was not a party to the suit as no application for substitution was made within one year of the plaintiff's death, as required by Order 24 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The suit had therefore abated, and the applicant, despite being a legal representative, had no locus standi to seek any orders in the proceedings. The court held that only a properly substituted party can move the court for orders, and since the applicant failed to comply with the mandatory procedural requirements, the application was incompetent. The preliminary objection was upheld, and the application was struck out with costs to the defendant.

Court Disposition

Application struck out with costs to the defendant.

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 9th July, 2021 is struck out.
  • Costs awarded to the defendant.