[2022] KEHC 2520 (KLR)
The court held that since the issue of sentence was a live issue on appeal in both the High Court and the Court of Appeal, and both courts made determinations on the matter, the applicant cannot now seek a further review of sentence under section 333 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The doctrine of finality of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 2520 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mwanzia Wambua; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Makueni
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application 68 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Sentence Review Application
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- GMA Dulu
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Review, Section 333 Criminal Procedure Code, Appeal Judgments, Finality of Appeals
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mwanzia Wambua
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Sentence Review Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a review of sentence under section 333 of the Criminal Procedure Code after the sentence has been considered and determined on appeal.
- 2 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain a sentence review application where the Court of Appeal has already determined the sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that since the issue of sentence was a live issue on appeal in both the High Court and the Court of Appeal, and both courts made determinations on the matter, the applicant cannot now seek a further review of sentence under section 333 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The doctrine of finality of appellate decisions applies, and the High Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain a fresh application on a matter already conclusively determined by superior appellate courts. Accordingly, the application for review of sentence is without merit and is dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for review of sentence is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MAKUENI
HC. MISC.CR. APPLICATION NO. 68 OF 2019
MWANZIA WAMBUA………………….……………..….…. APPLICANT
-VERSUS-
REPUBLIC………….……………………………..….….. RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The applicant has come to this court through a petition requesting that his sentence be reviewed in line with the provisions of section 333 of the Criminal Procedure Code (cap.75) and Article 50(2) of the Constitution.
2. In brief his request is that the period he was held in custody during trial be reduced from the sentence that was meted upon him.
3. I have not been availed the proceedings and judgment of the trial court, nor the judgment of his appeal to the High Court. I have however been availed the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Nairobi Criminal Appeal No. 81 of 2017 delivered on 24th January 2020.
4. In the appeal judgment from the Court of Appeal, it is acknowledged that the High Court appeal was Machakos HCCRA 295 of 2010, and that the judgment therein was delivered on 8th October 2015.
5. I note that in the concluding paragraph of the Court of Appeal judgment, it was stated as follows –
“For all the foregoing reasons, we reject the appeal on conviction but allow that on sentence to the extent that the enhanced term of life imprisonment is set aside and in its place the original sentence of forty (40) years imposed by the trial court is reinstated”
6. From the foregoing decision of the Court of Appeal, it is clear to me that the issue of the sentence imposed on the appellant was a live issue on appeal in the High Court and in the Court of Appeal, and both courts considered and made a determination on the issue. Thus in my view, the issue of section 333 Criminal Procedure Code on sentence cannot arise now in a separate side application or petition, as comprehensive determination on the aspects of the sentence imposed on the applicant herein, was made in the first appeal in the High Court, and also second appeal in the Court of Appeal, and was thus concluded.
7. I thus find no merits in this application for review of sentence, the same is hereby dismissed.
Delivered, signed & dated this 9th day of February 2022, in open court at Makueni.
……………………………….
George Dulu
Judge