[2018] KEELRC 2299 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 2299 (KLR)

The court found that while the Respondent had a valid reason for terminating the Claimants' employment due to operational requirements (redundancy), the procedure followed was grossly unfair and in breach of the mandatory requirements under section 40 of the Employment Act. The Respondent failed to give the required...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 2299 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Mwarua Yawa Nzao and 19 others; Respondent: Babs Security Services Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 657 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the Claimants in the respective sums indicated, plus costs and interest from the date of judgment, subject to statutory deductions.
Judges
AN Makau, L Ndolo
Legal Topics
Redundancy Procedure, Unfair Termination, Minimum Wage, Service Pay, Salary Underpayment, Accrued Leave
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Redundancy Procedure Unfair Termination Minimum Wage Service Pay Salary Underpayment Accrued Leave

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 20
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mwarua Yawa Nzao and 19 others

Applicant

Babs Security Services Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the Claimants' contracts of service was unfair.
  2. 2 Whether the Claimants are entitled to the reliefs sought, including compensation, salary arrears, service pay, and accrued leave.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that while the Respondent had a valid reason for terminating the Claimants' employment due to operational requirements (redundancy), the procedure followed was grossly unfair and in breach of the mandatory requirements under section 40 of the Employment Act. The Respondent failed to give the required one month written notice to the Claimants and the Labour Officer, did not conduct a fair selection process, and did not pay salary in lieu of notice, accrued benefits, or severance pay. The Claimants were also underpaid in violation of the minimum wage laws. As a result, the termination was declared unfair within the meaning of section 45 of the Act. The court awarded each...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the Claimants in the respective sums indicated, plus costs and interest from the date of judgment, subject to statutory deductions.

Orders

  • Each Claimant is awarded one month salary in lieu of notice, six months' salary as compensation for unfair termination, salary arrears for underpayment, unpaid salary for December 2015 and January 2016, service pay at 15 days per completed year of service, and one year's accrued leave, as per the tabulated amounts...
  • Claims for gratuity and public holidays worked are dismissed.