[2023] KEELRC 1477 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 1477 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was paid above the statutory minimum wage for the relevant periods, and there was no underpayment. The redundancy process complied with Section 40 of the Employment Act, with notice given to both the claimant and the union. The claimant received all terminal dues, including notice...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 1477 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Joseph Sanita Kitsao; Respondent: ARM Cement Plc
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 248 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
claim dismissed
Judges
M Mbarũ
Legal Topics
Redundancy Procedure, Terminal Dues, Minimum Wage Compliance, Notice Pay, Severance Pay
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Redundancy Procedure Terminal Dues Minimum Wage Compliance Notice Pay Severance Pay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joseph Sanita Kitsao

Claimant

ARM Cement Plc

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was underpaid in violation of the minimum wage orders.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was entitled to notice pay and severance pay upon redundancy.
  3. 3 Whether the redundancy process complied with Section 40 of the Employment Act, 2007.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was paid above the statutory minimum wage for the relevant periods, and there was no underpayment. The redundancy process complied with Section 40 of the Employment Act, with notice given to both the claimant and the union. The claimant received all terminal dues, including notice pay, severance pay, and payment for days worked. The claim for underpayment and additional dues was not justified, and the redundancy was a lawful reason for termination. Consequently, the claim lacked merit and was dismissed in its entirety.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed

Orders

  • The claim is dismissed in its entirety.
  • Each party shall bear its own costs.