[2025] KECPT 302 (KLR)

[2025] KECPT 302 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the claimant had established his resignation from the respondent society and the existence of both share deposits and an outstanding loan. The respondent failed to provide a statement of accounts or process the claimant's dues despite statutory and contractual obligations. The Tribunal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECPT 302 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Timothy Mwaura Mwathi; Respondent: Bacista Savings & Credit Cooperative Society
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 454 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Final Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Judges
BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Cooperative Societies, Member Resignation, Share Refunds, Loan Setoff
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Cooperative Societies Member Resignation Share Refunds Loan Setoff

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Timothy Mwaura Mwathi

Claimant

Bacista Savings & Credit Cooperative Society

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Claim / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to a statement of accounts from the respondent upon resignation as a member.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent is obligated to offset the claimant's outstanding loan against his shares and refund any surplus.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to costs and interest on the decretal sum.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the claimant had established his resignation from the respondent society and the existence of both share deposits and an outstanding loan. The respondent failed to provide a statement of accounts or process the claimant's dues despite statutory and contractual obligations. The Tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence regarding the amounts of deposits and outstanding loan, which were supported by documentary evidence and not disputed by the respondent. The Tribunal held that it was just and equitable to offset the outstanding loan against the claimant's deposits and order the immediate refund of the surplus to the claimant, together with costs and interest. The...

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • The respondent shall immediately refund Kshs. 225,169 to the claimant, being the surplus after offsetting deposits against the outstanding loan.
  • The claimant is awarded costs and interest on the decretal sum from the time of filing suit until payment in full.