[2025] KEHC 10297 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 10297 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds for urgency, given the risk of being denied access to the matrimonial properties and the need to preserve her rights pending the hearing of the main suit. However, the court declined to grant interim injunctive relief ex-parte, instead directing...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 10297 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Judy Wangari Mwaura; Respondent: Stephen Gitau Karanja
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Judgment Date
18 July 2025
Case Number
Matrimonial Cause E005 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Matrimonial Cause / Ruling on Certificate of Urgency and Directions on Notice of Motion
Outcome
Application certified as urgent; service ordered; interim orders to be canvassed inter-partes.
Judges
RN Nyakundi
Legal Topics
Matrimonial Property, Injunctive Relief, Access to Property, Interim Orders
Source Language
english
Family and Children Land and Property Matrimonial Property Injunctive Relief Access to Property Interim Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Judy Wangari Mwaura

Applicant

Stephen Gitau Karanja

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Matrimonial Cause / Ruling on Certificate of Urgency and Directions on Notice of Motion

  1. 1 Whether the application should be certified as urgent.
  2. 2 Whether interim injunctive relief should be granted to allow the applicant access to the matrimonial properties pending inter-partes hearing.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent should be compelled to provide access means to the applicant for the suit properties.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds for urgency, given the risk of being denied access to the matrimonial properties and the need to preserve her rights pending the hearing of the main suit. However, the court declined to grant interim injunctive relief ex-parte, instead directing that the application be served on the respondent and that all interim issues be canvassed at the inter-partes hearing. The court exercised caution in granting substantive orders without hearing both parties, in line with principles of fairness and due process. The matter was therefore certified as urgent, service was ordered, and a date for inter-partes hearing was set, with...

Court Disposition

Application certified as urgent; service ordered; interim orders to be canvassed inter-partes.

Orders

  • The application is certified as urgent.
  • The application to be served upon the respondent within 14 days.