[2020] KEELRC 4 (KLR)

[2020] KEELRC 4 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent failed to discharge the statutory burden of justifying the termination of the claimant's employment. The respondent did not provide evidence to support the claim that he was not the employer. The claimant's evidence of employment, underpayment, overtime, and lack of notice was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELRC 4 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Mwendo Katiku; Respondent: David Koine t/a City Watch Guards Service
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1268 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant; unfair termination declared; monetary awards granted; each party to bear own costs.
Judges
M Mbarũ
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Wage Underpayment, Overtime Entitlement, Annual Leave, Notice Pay, Compensation for Termination
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Wage Underpayment Overtime Entitlement Annual Leave Notice Pay Compensation for Termination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mwendo Katiku

Claimant

David Koine t/a City Watch Guards Service

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly terminated from employment contrary to the Employment Act, 2007.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to underpayment of wages, overtime, annual leave, notice pay, and compensation as claimed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent failed to discharge the statutory burden of justifying the termination of the claimant's employment. The respondent did not provide evidence to support the claim that he was not the employer. The claimant's evidence of employment, underpayment, overtime, and lack of notice was unchallenged. The court held that the termination was unfair under section 45 of the Employment Act, 2007. The claimant was entitled to underpayments, overtime, leave pay, notice pay, and compensation as per the Wage Orders and the Employment Act. Severance pay was not awarded as the case did not involve redundancy. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant; unfair termination declared; monetary awards granted; each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • A declaration that there was unfair termination of employment.
  • Compensation awarded at Ksh.10,204.87.