[2012] KEHC 4462 (KLR)
The court found that the Respondent deserted the Petitioner in December 2002 and did not return or provide support thereafter. The petition was filed in August 2011, more than three years after the desertion, satisfying the statutory requirement for divorce on grounds of desertion under Section 8(1)(b) of the Matrimonial Causes Act. Although the Petitioner raised issues regarding the Respondent's prior marriage, the court held that such matters could not be considered as they were not pleaded in the petition. The unopposed evidence established the matrimonial offence of desertion, entitling the Petitioner to a decree of divorce as prayed.
- Citation
- [2012] KEHC 4462 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: M.W.M; Respondent: K.N
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2012
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 141 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition allowed. Marriage dissolved.
- Judges
- CM Njagi
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Matrimonial Offences, Desertion, Adultery, Marriage Validity
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M.W.M
Petitioner
K.N
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent deserted the Petitioner without cause for at least three years preceding the petition.
- 2 Whether the Petitioner is entitled to dissolution of marriage on grounds of desertion and adultery.
- 3 Whether the validity of the marriage is affected by the Respondent's alleged prior marriage.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Respondent deserted the Petitioner in December 2002 and did not return or provide support thereafter. The petition was filed in August 2011, more than three years after the desertion, satisfying the statutory requirement for divorce on grounds of desertion under Section 8(1)(b) of the Matrimonial Causes Act. Although the Petitioner raised issues regarding the Respondent's prior marriage, the court held that such matters could not be considered as they were not pleaded in the petition. The unopposed evidence established the matrimonial offence of desertion, entitling the Petitioner to a decree of divorce as prayed.
Court Disposition
Petition allowed. Marriage dissolved.
Orders
- The marriage solemnized between the parties in June 1999 is dissolved.
- Decree nisi to issue.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment