[2016] KEHC 3824 (KLR)
The court found that there was insufficient evidence at this stage to conclusively determine whether the 1st Petitioner was a spouse of the deceased by marriage or presumption of marriage. The Objector, as a brother to the deceased, was recognized as having a legitimate interest in the estate and was entitled to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 3824 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Mzee Mohamed; Applicant: John Chege; Respondent: John Njenga Mbara
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Naivasha
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 56 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Objection to Petition for Grant of Letters of Administration
- Outcome
- Grant of letters of administration to issue jointly to the 1st and 2nd Petitioners and the Objector; costs to be borne by each party.
- Judges
- CW Meoli
- Legal Topics
- Intestate Succession, Presumption of Marriage, Beneficiary Identification
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mzee Mohamed
Applicant
John Chege
Applicant
John Njenga Mbara
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Objection to Petition for Grant of Letters of Administration
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1st Petitioner was legally married to the deceased or can be presumed to be a spouse for succession purposes.
- 2 Whether all beneficiaries of the deceased's estate were properly identified and included in the petition.
- 3 Whether the Objector, as a brother to the deceased, was entitled to participate in the succession proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there was insufficient evidence at this stage to conclusively determine whether the 1st Petitioner was a spouse of the deceased by marriage or presumption of marriage. The Objector, as a brother to the deceased, was recognized as having a legitimate interest in the estate and was entitled to participate in the proceedings. The court held that the proper identification of beneficiaries and the distribution of the estate would be determined at the confirmation of grant stage, after further evidence is adduced if necessary. Accordingly, the court ordered that a grant of letters of administration be issued jointly to the 1st and 2nd Petitioners and the Objector, with...
Court Disposition
Grant of letters of administration to issue jointly to the 1st and 2nd Petitioners and the Objector; costs to be borne by each party.
Orders
- A grant of letters of administration shall issue in the joint names of the 1st and 2nd Petitioners and the Objector.
- If parties are unable to agree on the identities of the beneficiaries and distribution, proceedings shall be taken by way of affidavits and submissions at the confirmation of grant stage.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIVASHA
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 56 OF 2015
FORMERLY NAKURU SUCCESSION CAUSE 436 OF 2010
IN THE MATTER OF ESTATE OF
ESTHER WANGUI CHEGE …………………………………DECEASED
MZEE MOHAMED……………….…..………………..1ST PETITIONER
JOHN CHEGE……………….…..…………………….2ND PETITIONER
-VERSUS-
JOHN NJENGA MBARA……………...……..……………..OBJECTOR
R U L I N G
1. The deceased herein died intestate on 16th January, 2015. At the time, she was cohabiting with the first Petitioner as man and wife. Following her death, the funeral committee authorized the two Petitioners herein to commence succession proceedings.
2. However, upon the proceedings being gazetted, the Objector raised an objection to the effect that as a brother to the deceased he was not involved, that not all the beneficiaries were listed, and finally that the 1st Petitioner was not legally married to the deceased, not having paid dowry.
3. For his part, the Respondent asserts himself to be the widower who survived the deceased and lists several debts allegedly owed by the deceased at the time of death. He disputes the Objector’s right to participate in the proceedings and asserts that all the beneficiaries had been included in the Petition.
4. I have considered the affidavits filed herein as well as the submissions by the parties. There is no dispute that the Objector is a brother to the deceased while the 2nd Petitioner is a nephew. The deceased left no children, but it would seem from the Respondent’s annextures MM2(a) and (b) that the 1st Petitioner, referred to as Mzee Mohamed was taken as a member of the family of the deceased, whether or not any dowry had been paid to the Objector’s family.
5. I think it will require further evidence to confirm whether a marriage or presumption of marriage between the 1st Petitioner and the deceased can be established. Such evidence will enable the court to determine whether to treat the 1st Petitioner as a surviving spouse or even as a dependant of the deceased.
6. Secondly, it seems to me that one of the underlying issues behind the objection is the distribution of the estate of the deceased, which also can be determined at the proper timer, during the confirmation of the grant.
7. For now, I would order that a grant issues in the joint names of the 1st and 2nd Petitioners as well as the Objector. If parties are unable to agree on the identities of the beneficiaries and distribution, then proceedings will have to be taken by way of affidavits and submissions in respect of any application for confirmation of the grant herein issued. Parties to bear own costs.
Delivered and signed on this29thday of July, 2016.
In the presence of:-
For the Petitioner s : Miss Kithinji holding brief for Mr. Njuguna
For the Objector : In person
Court Clerk : Barasa
C. MEOLI
JUDGE