[2013] KEHC 714 (KLR)
The court found that the Respondent deserted the matrimonial home two months after the marriage and had not returned for over five years, despite efforts at reconciliation. The evidence established the matrimonial offence of desertion and demonstrated that the marriage had irretrievably broken down. The Respondent's...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 714 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: N P P; Respondent: P N P
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 54 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed; marriage dissolved
- Judges
- LK Kimaru, DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Matrimonial Offences, Desertion, Irretrievable Breakdown, Marriage Dissolution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
N P P
Petitioner
P N P
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent deserted the matrimonial home, constituting a matrimonial offence.
- 2 Whether the marriage between the Petitioner and Respondent has irretrievably broken down.
- 3 Whether the Petitioner is entitled to a decree of divorce.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Respondent deserted the matrimonial home two months after the marriage and had not returned for over five years, despite efforts at reconciliation. The evidence established the matrimonial offence of desertion and demonstrated that the marriage had irretrievably broken down. The Respondent's failure to appear or contest the petition further supported the Petitioner’s case. The court concluded that there was no possibility of reconciliation and that the legal threshold for dissolution of marriage had been met. Accordingly, the court granted the petition for divorce and issued a decree nisi dissolving the marriage.
Court Disposition
petition allowed; marriage dissolved
Orders
- The marriage celebrated on 30th September 2008 between the Petitioner and Respondent is dissolved.
- A decree nisi dissolving the marriage is issued.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
DIVORCE CAUSE NO.54 OF 2012
N P P…………..….…………….……......………………………….PETITIONER
VERSUS
P N P………….….….……………..…………………………………….RESPONDENT
J U D G M E N T
The Petitioner and the Respondent were on 30th September 2008 married at the Registrar’s Office in Nairobi. The marriage was celebrated under the Marriage Act. After the celebration of the said marriage, the Petitioner and the Respondent cohabited together as husband and wife in Nairobi. The marriage has not been blessed with any issues. According to the Petitioner, the Respondent deserted from the matrimonial home on 30th November 2008. Since then, she has not returned to the matrimonial home. The Petitioner avers that all efforts by the Petitioner, his parents and elders of the community to reconcile them had failed. The Petitioner was of the view that the Respondent’s refusal to return to the matrimonial home meant that his marriage to the Respondent had irretrievably broken down with no chance of reconciliation. In the premises therefore, the Petitioner urged the court to grant his petition for divorce and dissolve the marriage.
The Respondent was served with a copy of the petition for divorce together with a notice requiring her to enter appearance. She did not enter appearance. Neither did she file an answer to the petition. The Deputy Registrar of this court issued a certificate certifying that this was a suitable divorce cause to be disposed of as an undefended cause. During the hearing of the cause, this court heard oral evidence adduced by the Petitioner. He essentially reiterated the contents of his petition for divorce. He told the court that his differences with the Respondent started during their honeymoon when the Respondent refused to consummate the marriage. The differences escalated when they returned to their matrimonial home leading to their separation on 30th November 2008. Since then, any effort at reconciliation had been unsuccessful. This court has considered the evidence adduced by the Petitioner in this cause. It was clear to the court that the marriage between the Petitioner and the Respondent has indeed irretrievably broken down with no possibility of reconciliation. The Petitioner and the Respondent only lived together for a period of two (2) months. They have since been separated for a period of more than five (5) years. Efforts at reconciliation have proved unsuccessful. The Petitioner established the matrimonial offence of desertion. In the premises therefore, this court will grant petition for divorce.
The marriage celebrated on 30th September 2008 at the Registrar’s Office in Nairobi between the Petitioner and the Respondent is hereby dissolved. Decree nisi dissolving the said marriage is hereby issued. The decree nisi shall be made absolute thirty (30) from the date of this judgment. There shall be no orders as to costs.
L. KIMARU
JUDGE
DATED, COUNTERSIGNED AND DELIVERED ON 15TH DAY OF AUGUST 2013.
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE