[2011] KEHC 563 (KLR)
The court found that Naftali Ontweka Okenye obtained the grant of letters of administration by failing to disclose material facts, specifically omitting the widow, Marcellah Nyangau Okenye, from the list of beneficiaries. This omission constituted fraud and justified revocation of the grant under section 76 of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 563 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Naftali Ontweka Okenye; Respondent: Marcellah Nyangau Okenye
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 405 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Remove Administrator and Revoke Grant
- Outcome
- application allowed; grant revoked; land to revert to estate
- Judges
- CC Kipkorir
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Grant, Administrator Removal, Non Disclosure of Beneficiaries, Priority of Beneficiaries
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Naftali Ontweka Okenye
Applicant
Marcellah Nyangau Okenye
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Remove Administrator and Revoke Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant of letters of administration issued to Naftali Ontweka Okenye should be revoked due to non-disclosure of material facts.
- 2 Whether the name of Naftali Ontweka Okenye should be deleted as administrator of the estate in respect of specified land parcels.
- 3 Whether the transfer of the deceased's property to Naftali Ontweka Okenye was lawful.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Naftali Ontweka Okenye obtained the grant of letters of administration by failing to disclose material facts, specifically omitting the widow, Marcellah Nyangau Okenye, from the list of beneficiaries. This omission constituted fraud and justified revocation of the grant under section 76 of the Law of Succession Act. The court further held that Naftali's subsequent transfer of the deceased's properties into his own name was facilitated by the improperly obtained grant. Since the respondent did not contest the allegations, the court accepted the applicant's evidence as uncontroverted. In the interests of justice, the court revoked the grant issued to Naftali Ontweka...
Court Disposition
application allowed; grant revoked; land to revert to estate
Orders
- The grant of letters of administration issued to Naftali Ontweka Okenye in respect of the estate of Livingstone Okenye Orina is revoked.
- The Land Register in respect of Land Parcel Nos. South Mugirango/Nyataaro/185, 3 and 374 currently in the names of Naftali Ontweka Okenye shall revert to the deceased’s estate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KISII
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 405 OF 2009
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF:
LIVINGSTONE OKENYE ORINA ………………………….....................................… DECEASED
AND
NAFTALI ONTWEKA OKENYE ……………………..………….............……….…... APPLICANT
-VERSUS-
MARCELLAH NYANGAU OKENYE …………………………............…………..…..OBJECTOR
RULING
This application is brought by the objector vide rule 49 of the Probate and Administration Rules. It seeks orders that:
a.The name of the applicant herein be deleted and/or cancelled as the administrator of the estate of the deceased in respect of land parcels no’s South Mugirango/Nyataaro 185, 3 and 374.
b.Costs of the application be provided for.
The objector/applicant one Marcellah Nyangau Okenye states in her affidavit in support of the application that one, Naftal Ontweka Okenye filed and obtained a grant in respect of the deceased’s estate on 29th September, 2009. Upon obtaining a grant he proceeded to the lands office and got registered as the proprietor of land parcel nos. South Mugirango/Nyataro/185, 3 and 374. Subsequently, he voluntarily withdrew from the succession cause.
Though dated 4th January, 2010 and filed on 18th January, 2010, under certificate of urgency, the application was for reasons not apparent to the court not prosecuted until 7th October, 2011 when it came before Sitati J. who directed the applicant to file a further affidavit.
The application then came before me on 14th October, 2011. The objector/applicant was represented by Mr. Soire while the respondent did not attend court despite having been served.
In his brief address to court, Mr. Soire stated that he wished to rely on the affidavit dated 4th December, 2009 and a further affidavit dated 13th October, 2011 both sworn by Marcellah Nyang’au Okenye, the applicant in the instant summons.
I have perused the affidavits and indeed the entire court record in respect of this matter. I make the following observations:-
i.That a successful attempt was made by the applicant, one Naftali Ontweka Okenye to obtain Letters of Administration in respect of the estate of one Livingstone Okenye Orina, the deceased. The grant was issued by the Hon. Muchelule J. on 29th September, 2009. In her affidavit, the applicant alleges that the process of obtaining the grant was fraudulent as the said Naftali Ontweke Okenye did not disclose material facts in his petition and in particular that he left her out of the list of beneficiaries. These allegations have not been challenged.
ii.The present applicant Marcellah Nyangau Okenye has deponed that she is the widow of the deceased and that Naftal Ontweka Okenye is her second born son meaning that he does not rank first in priority in the succession of her deceased husband’s estate. This must be taken to be true as the same has not been controverted.
iii.Naftal Ontweka Okenyeproceeded to use the grant to transfer the deceased’s property into his name and thereafter purported to withdraw from the succession cause by giving a notice to court vide his letter dated 1st December, 2009. It is my conviction that the purported withdrawal was meant to defeat the application by the widow, Marcellah Nyangau Okenye for the revocation of the grant issued to him. Indeed he did succeed as when the application came before this honourable court on 10th December, 2010, Ali Aroni J. directed that there was no suit pending and therefore the court had no basis for granting prayers sought in the application dated 3rd November, 2009.
The present application has been triggered by the conduct of Naftal Ontweka Okenye (applicant in the Succession Cause) and respondent in the present application. To reiterate, upon obtaining the grant on 29th September, 2009 he proceeded to transfer the deceased’s properties South Mugirango/Nyataaro/185, 3 and 374 respectively into his names on the 22nd October, 2009. This was only possible because of the grant issued to him. Indeed it is the grant that gave him the legal basis for the transaction in the land register. The applicant, (Marcella Nyangau Okenye) prays that the name of Naftal Ontweka Okenye be deleted and/or cancelled as the administrator of the estate in respect of land parcels Nos. South Mugirango/Nyataaro 185, 3and374. She does not pray that the grant issued to him be annulled in its entirety. It is however my considered opinion that to the extent that the conduct in question was facilitated by the grant, and to the extent that the said grant though not confirmed has neither been annulled nor revoked, it continues to be a valid legal document. I therefore move in the interests of justice under section 3A of the Civil Procedure Actand section 76 of the Law of Succession Act to revoke the grant issued to Naftali Ontweka Okenye in respect of the estate of Livingstone Okenye Orina, deceased. I further order that the Land Register in respect of Land Parcel Nos. South Mugirango/ Nyataaro/185, 3and374currently in the names of the respondent Naftal Ontweka Okenye revert to the deceased’s estate.
Ruling dated, signed anddelivered at Kisiithis 14th day of October 2011.
R. LAGAT KORIR
JUDGE