[2024] KEHC 10454 (KLR)
The court held that, pursuant to Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, any period spent by the applicant in pretrial custody must be considered when computing the custodial sentence. The absence of trial court proceedings did not preclude the court from granting the application, as the statutory provision...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 10454 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Joshua Ouya Nambute; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E101 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- MS Shariff
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Computation, Pretrial Detention Credit
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joshua Ouya Nambute
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to have the pretrial term served deducted from his custodial sentence under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, pursuant to Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, any period spent by the applicant in pretrial custody must be considered when computing the custodial sentence. The absence of trial court proceedings did not preclude the court from granting the application, as the statutory provision is clear and mandatory. The application was therefore allowed, and the relevant authorities were directed to factor in the pretrial term served by the applicant when calculating his sentence.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The pretrial term served by the applicant shall be taken into account when computing his custodial sentence pursuant to Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- This file is marked as closed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
Nambute v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E101 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 10454 (KLR) (27 August 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 10454 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E101 of 2024
MS Shariff, J
August 27, 2024
Between
Joshua Ouya Nambute
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. The Applicant herein has moved this court for orders that the computation of his custodial term should factor in the pretrial term served.
2. Whereas the proceedings of the trial court have not been annexed I am inclined to allow the application. I thus order that pursuant to the provisions of Section 333 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, any pretrial term served should be taken into account when computing the Applicant’s term.
3. It is hereby so ordered.
4. This file is marked as closed.
DELIVERED, SIGNED AND DATED AT KISUMU THIS 27THDAY OF AUGUST, 2024. M. S. SHARIFFJUDGE