[2009] KEHC 2283 (KLR)
The court found that the biological mother had initially given consent to the Child Welfare Society of Kenya and could not be traced thereafter. Given the circumstances of the child.s birth and the absence of any contact with the biological mother, the court exercised its discretion to dispense with the requirement...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 2283 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: [Names withheld]; Respondent: Child Welfare Society of Kenya
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 7 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- KH Rawal
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Dispensation of Consent, Best Interests of Child
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
[Names withheld]
Applicant
Child Welfare Society of Kenya
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should dispense with the requirement of the biological mother.s consent for adoption.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the biological mother had initially given consent to the Child Welfare Society of Kenya and could not be traced thereafter. Given the circumstances of the child.s birth and the absence of any contact with the biological mother, the court exercised its discretion to dispense with the requirement for further consent. The court was satisfied with the applicants. financial stability, physical fitness, and prior experience as adoptive parents. Reports from the Director of Children Services, the Child Welfare Society, and the guardian ad litem all supported the adoption as being in the best interests of the child. Accordingly, the court granted the adoption order, allowing...
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants are allowed to adopt the child to be known as S. W. K. [particulars withheld].
- The child.s date of birth shall be recorded as 12th September, 2004.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLICOFKENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
Adoption Cause 7 of 2006
IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTION OF BABY L
JUDGMENT
The Applicants had been married under Customary Law since 1985 and formalized their relation as a monogamous marriage under the Marriage Act (Cap 150) on 28th January, 2000.
An amended Originating Summons was filed as per directives of the court on 22nd April, 2009, which included prayer for dispensation of the final consent of the biological mother as per Section 159(a) (i) of the Children Act. Before the child was handed over to the Applicants on 22nd June, 2005. The Child Welfare Society of Kenya, an Adoption Society did receive consent by the biological mother. The child was conceived by her after an unfortunate and traumatic assault on her and that is the reason for her to offer the child for adoption on 4th November, 2004 who was born on 12th September, 2004.
Since then, the Child Welfare Society or other authorities as well as the applicants have not heard from the biological mother. The child has not seen or known any other parents or home.
Under the circumstances, I should not and do not have any reason not to exercise my discretion and do hereby dispense with the requirement of the consent to be filed by the biological parent.
Coming back to the merits of the cause, the 1st Applicant is working as a Supervisor of a Supermarket and the family has Dairy cattle and tea plantations. Their income from all these sources is comfortable. The Applicants have also produced medical certificates to show that they are physically fit. The court needed that confirmation due to the fact that the 1st Applicant is about to touch the maximum age prescribed by the Act.
The couple had adopted a child prior to this application and want to complete their family by seeking an order for second adoption. The elder daughter has taken the child as her own sibling, who is now around 12 years and schooling.
The Applicants were unable to have their own children and that is the reason they want to share their love and parental responsibilities with the child.
I have perused the two reports from the Director of Children Services and Child Welfare Society. They have unhesitantly opined that the order of adoption would be in the best interest of the child.
The guardian ad litem is also of the same opinion.
After considering the facts of this cause, I cannot do better than follow the recommendations and to add that in my opinion an unwanted child has found the parents and a loving family.
I thus allow the Applicants to adopt the child to be known as S. W. K. [particulars withheld pursuant to sections 76 (5) of the Children Act, 2001] whose date of birth shall be recorded as 12th September, 2004.
These orders be entered into the Adoption Register.
I hereby discharge the guardian ad litem from the date hereof.
Dated, signed and delivered at Nairobi this 5th day of June, 2009.
K.H. RAWAL
JUDGE
5. 6.09