[2008] KEHC 3849 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant, as the registered proprietor of the subject land, had sufficient interest and had not been given an opportunity to be heard by the Murang’a Land Disputes Tribunal. This omission raised a prima facie arguable case regarding the Tribunal’s exercise of jurisdiction over registered...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 3849 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Nancy Addah Wambui; Respondent: The Principal Magistrate’s Court at Murang’a; Respondent: Murang’a Land Disputes Tribunal
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 313 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Chamber Summons for Leave to File Judicial Review and Stay
- Outcome
- Application allowed; leave granted to file judicial review; leave to operate as stay subject to timely filing.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Certiorari, Land Disputes Tribunal Jurisdiction, Right to Be Heard
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nancy Addah Wambui
Applicant
The Principal Magistrate’s Court at Murang’a
Respondent
Murang’a Land Disputes Tribunal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Chamber Summons for Leave to File Judicial Review and Stay
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to leave to commence judicial review proceedings for orders of certiorari against the adoption of the Land Disputes Tribunal award.
- 2 Whether the leave, if granted, should operate as a stay of the decision of the Principal Magistrate’s Court.
- 3 Whether the applicant, as the registered proprietor, was denied the right to be heard before the Tribunal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant, as the registered proprietor of the subject land, had sufficient interest and had not been given an opportunity to be heard by the Murang’a Land Disputes Tribunal. This omission raised a prima facie arguable case regarding the Tribunal’s exercise of jurisdiction over registered land and the applicant’s right to be heard. The court held that the applicant had met the threshold for grant of leave to commence judicial review proceedings and that, to prevent substantial and irreparable loss, the leave should operate as a stay of the Tribunal’s award, provided the main motion is filed within 21 days.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; leave granted to file judicial review; leave to operate as stay subject to timely filing.
Orders
- Leave is granted to the applicant to file Judicial Review proceedings as requested in prayer 2 of the Chamber Summons. The main motion must be filed within 21 days.
- The grant of leave will operate as a stay as requested in prayer 3 of the Chamber Summons, provided the main motion is filed within 21 days; otherwise, the stay lapses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
Misc.Civil Appli. 313 of 2008
NANCY ADDAH WAMBUI………………………………………………... APPLICANT
V E R S U S
THE PRINCIPAL MAGISTRATE’S COURT AT MURANG’A …. 1ST RESPONDENT
MURANG’A LAND DISPUTES TRIBUNAL……………………….2ND RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
Before me is an ex-parte Chamber Summons dated 28th May, 2008 filed by M/S Kimandu Gichohi & Company advocates for the applicant. It was brought under Order 53 rule 1 and 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules and all other enabling provisions of the law. It seeks leave to file Judicial Review proceedings for orders of certiorari arising from the adoption of Murang’a Land Dispute Tribunal Award in Murang’a Principal Magistrate’s Land Disputes Tribunal case No. 92 of 2002. It also seeks for orders that the leave, if granted, do operate as a stay of the decision of the Muranga Principal Magistrate’s Court.
The application was filed with the statutory STATEMENT OF FACTS as well as VERIFYING AFFIDAVIT as required by law.
At the hearing of the application, Mr. Gichohi for the applicant submitted that the matter was urgent, and that a certificate of urgency was filed. Counsel submitted that the subject land was registered in the sole name of the applicant. At the Land Tribunal case, the applicant was not summoned, but his late husband was called before the Tribunal. Counsel contended that Implementation of the award would be prejudiced to the applicant, as she stood to be evicted from her home which stands on the property. Therefore, there was need for grant of leave to file Judicial Review proceedings as well as stay orders.
I have considered the application, documents filed and submissions of Counsel for the ex-parte applicant. From the documents filed, it appears that the applicant is the sole registered owner of the subject property land parcel LOC. 18/GITHIMA/434- in Kigumo Division. The applicant also does not appear to have been called to appear and be heard by the Murang’a Land Disputes Tribunal.
From the facts before me, I am of the view that the applicant has a sufficient interest as the apparent registered proprietor of the subject land. In my view, she has also demonstrated a prima facie arguable case regarding the exercise of jurisdiction on registered land by the Murang’a Land Disputes Tribunal, without even being given a chance to be heard as the registered proprietor. I am also of the view that if stay orders are not granted, the applicant is likely to suffer substantial irreparable loss.
For the above reasons, I allow the application and order as follows-
1. Leave be and is hereby granted to the applicant to file Judicial Review proceedings as requested in prayer 2 of the Chamber Summons. The main motion will be filed within 21 days from today.
2. The grant of leave above will operate as a stay as requested in prayer 3 of the Chamber Summons provided that the main motion is filed within 21 days from today, and in default the stay orders herein granted will automatically lapse.
3. Costs in the cause.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 6th day of June, 2008.
George Dulu
Judge.
In the presence of-
Mr. Gichohi for applicant – Mr. Ndirangu holding brief.
Mwangi court clerk.