[2023] KEELC 16443 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 16443 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant and his family have been in continuous occupation and possession of the disputed 3½ acres of land since 1979, based on unchallenged evidence including a sale agreement and supporting documents. The respondent failed to oppose the application or provide any evidence to the contrary....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 16443 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Felix Onyango Nanjala (Suing on behalf of Joseph Onyango Ogalo); Respondent: Rosemary Barasa Okada (Sued on behalf of John Oduku Balongo)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Busia
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case E012 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Inhibition and Injunction
Outcome
Application allowed; orders of inhibition and temporary injunction granted.
Judges
BN Olao
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunctions, Inhibition Orders, Land Ownership Disputes, Adverse Possession, Succession and Estates
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Interlocutory Injunctions Inhibition Orders Land Ownership Disputes Adverse Possession Succession and Estates

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Felix Onyango Nanjala (Suing on behalf of Joseph Onyango Ogalo)

Applicant

Rosemary Barasa Okada (Sued on behalf of John Oduku Balongo)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Inhibition and Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an order of inhibition to prevent dealings with the suit land pending determination of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a temporary injunction restraining the respondent from interfering with occupation and possession of the disputed land.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient interest and grounds for the preservation of the suit property.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant and his family have been in continuous occupation and possession of the disputed 3½ acres of land since 1979, based on unchallenged evidence including a sale agreement and supporting documents. The respondent failed to oppose the application or provide any evidence to the contrary. The court held that the applicant had established a sufficient interest in the suit land and demonstrated the need to preserve the property pending the hearing and determination of the main suit. The legal threshold for granting both inhibition and temporary injunction was met, as the applicant showed a prima facie case and risk of irreparable harm if the orders were not...

Court Disposition

Application allowed; orders of inhibition and temporary injunction granted.

Orders

  • An order of inhibition is issued inhibiting registration of any dealings, including transfer or charge, on Land Parcel No Bunyala/mudembi/1773 pending hearing and determination of the suit.
  • An order of temporary injunction is issued restraining the respondent, agents, family, or any person acting through them from interfering with the applicant's occupation and possession of the 3½ acres of land comprised in Land Parcel No Bunyala/mudembi/1773 until the case is heard and determined.