[2018] KEHC 527 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant had made consistent and documented efforts to obtain the lower court file and move the appeal forward. The delay in prosecuting the appeal was due to the disappearance of the lower court file, a circumstance beyond the appellant's control. The court held that it would be unjust to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 527 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Naomi Watiri Chege; Respondent: John Ng’ang’a Kanini
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 587 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
- Outcome
- Appellant granted 15 days to file record of appeal and 15 days thereafter to fix for directions; failure to comply results in automatic dismissal of appeal.
- Judges
- LM Njuguna
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Appeal Record Filing, Court Registry Delay
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Naomi Watiri Chege
Appellant
John Ng’ang’a Kanini
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to delay in filing the record of appeal.
- 2 Whether the delay in prosecuting the appeal was attributable to the appellant or to circumstances beyond their control.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant had made consistent and documented efforts to obtain the lower court file and move the appeal forward. The delay in prosecuting the appeal was due to the disappearance of the lower court file, a circumstance beyond the appellant's control. The court held that it would be unjust to penalize the appellant for administrative shortcomings within the court registry. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion to grant the appellant additional time to file the record of appeal and take steps to prosecute the appeal, with a clear warning that failure to comply would result in automatic dismissal.
Court Disposition
Appellant granted 15 days to file record of appeal and 15 days thereafter to fix for directions; failure to comply results in automatic dismissal of appeal.
Orders
- The appellant shall file the record of appeal within 15 days from the date of this ruling.
- The appellant shall fix the appeal for directions within 15 days from the date of filing the record of appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CIVIL APPEAL NO.587 OF 2013
NAOMI WATIRI CHEGE............................................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
JOHN NG’ANG’A KANINI......................................................RESPONDENT
(Appeal from the Judgment and decree of Honourable SK. Arome in Principal Magistrate’s Court at Kiambu delivered on 18th October, 2013 in PMCC No. 709 of 1995)
RULING
The Appeal herein was filed on the 14th day of November 2013 but due to the slow pace at which it was being prosecuted, the court served the parties herein with a notice to show cause under Order 42 Rule 35(2) to appear before it on the 27th July, 2018 and show cause why the Appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution.
On the said date, counsel for the Appellant sought time to file an affidavit in response to the notice to show cause which he filed on 12th September, 2018.
In the affidavit, he depones that prior to filing of the Appeal he had written to the trial court at Kiambu, requesting for the proceedings, decree and a copy of the judgment. He has annexed the letter dated the 29th October, 2013 and marked as annexture SK1.
That on the 31st March, 2014 the lower court file was forwarded to the High Court and it was acknowledged via a letter dated 3rd March, 2014 by the Deputy Registrar, Family Division.
He further depones that, on 1st April 2015, he wrote a letter to court seeking a mention date for directions. He has annexed a copy of that letter as annexture SK 3and thereafter he drafted the index and record of Appeal but he was unable to file the same as the court file could not be traced. That on the 19th May 2017 he again wrote to the court seeking a date for directions, that letter is marked as annexture SK 6. He avers that the Appellant has been willing to prosecute the Appeal were it not for the missing lower court record. He has prayed to the court to give him 7 days to file a record of Appeal and thereafter take a date for directions.
The court has considered the contents of the affidavit showing cause why the Appeal should not be dismissed. From the annextures displayed to the court, it is clear that the Appellant has been making tremendous efforts to have the Appeal move forward but has been frustrated by the disappearance of the lower court file without which the Appeal could not move.
I have noted from the annexed correspondences that the file was forwarded to this court and received via a letter dated 3rd March 2014. The file must be lying somewhere in the registry. It is therefore not the Appellant’s fault that the Appeal has not been prosecuted. He has done his best to follow up the matter.
In the premises, I do order that the Appellant do file the Record of Appeal within 15 days from the date of this ruling and thereafter fix the Appeal for directions within 15 days from the date of filing of the Record of Appeal failing which, the Appeal shall stand dismissed.
It is so ordered.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Nairobi this 5th day of November, 2018
...........................
L. NJUGUNA
JUDGE
In the presence of:-
……………………………..For the Appellant
……………………………...For the Respondent